Jump to content

Talk:Webshots: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
== Excite@Home ==
== Excite@Home ==
Webshots was bought & owned by Excite@home in around 2000. I believe the former founder of Webshots bought it back from E@H when they were having trouble. Kind of funny how webshots has been sold twice to big internet portal companies.
Webshots was bought & owned by Excite@home in around 2000. I believe the former founder of Webshots bought it back from E@H when they were having trouble. Kind of funny how webshots has been sold twice to big internet portal companies.

Why has webshots seemingly removed all their titillating search options? Fucking puritans. Expand your mother fucking mind, square.

Revision as of 01:44, 5 February 2008

A citation is needed. I think it’s likely that Flickr is larger and “more popular” (whatever that means). --Nate Silva 02:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --Meno25 10:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Shouldn't Webshots be merged with an artilce about CNET? uyi 10:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwert uyi (talkcontribs)

Excite@Home

Webshots was bought & owned by Excite@home in around 2000. I believe the former founder of Webshots bought it back from E@H when they were having trouble. Kind of funny how webshots has been sold twice to big internet portal companies.

Why has webshots seemingly removed all their titillating search options? Fucking puritans. Expand your mother fucking mind, square.