Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tasmania: Difference between revisions
JarrahTree (talk | contribs) yeahbut |
→Page heading: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Dubious== |
==Dubious== |
||
Possibly copyvio art needs further attention - ''Levendale, Tasmania'' - apart from lack of tone it reads like a copy [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
Possibly copyvio art needs further attention - ''Levendale, Tasmania'' - apart from lack of tone it reads like a copy [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Page heading == |
|||
I believe that the heading and page title 'Tasmania' although very acurate could be better described by adding Australia to the heading, and example is Victorias page. I think that this gives better understanding at a glance of where Tasmanaia is when looking at it in the wiki searc results. |
Revision as of 23:23, 14 February 2008
This talk page is automatically archived by Shadowbot3. Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tasmania/Archive1. Sections without timestamps are not archived
Archive 1 Sep 2005 - Sep 2007 |
Climbing Guides or Encyclopediac entries
Considerable amounts of the mountain and walking track articles for Tasmania read more like ad hoc notes on walking and climbing than actually being what they should be - entries in an encyclopedia - lack of any refs of any sorts and very sloppy tone/writing - any help to clean em up would be appreciated SatuSuro 00:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Dubious
Possibly copyvio art needs further attention - Levendale, Tasmania - apart from lack of tone it reads like a copy SatuSuro 06:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Page heading
I believe that the heading and page title 'Tasmania' although very acurate could be better described by adding Australia to the heading, and example is Victorias page. I think that this gives better understanding at a glance of where Tasmanaia is when looking at it in the wiki searc results.