Talk:Foundation for Family and Life: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:50, 15 February 2008

For future reference:

- Couples for Christ (CFC) has filed a cease and desist order in the Securities and Exchange Commission for the Foundation for Family and Life (FFL) to stop using the CFC name, as FFL has formally severed all ties with CFC. Therefore, this article should not have the CFC name with FFL (ex. CFC-FFL). The full formal name of FFL is the Foundation for Family and Life, Inc. FFL is still pending official registration in the SEC.

-cfcyfcsolid

Please stop biased edits on this Wikipedia article.

ex. "FFL practices the true and authentic charism of the original CFC"

It is incorrect to refer to CFC as "CFC-IC", as the Couples for Christ International Council is only made up of top CFC leaders; thus the name CFC-IC would imply that all of CFC is part of the International Council, which is not true.

It is incorrect to refer to CFC as "CFC-GK", as this is not the name of CFC, and Gawad Kalinga is only a ministry of CFC.

It is unnecessary to refer to CFC as "CFC-GMFI", as CFC's full name since its inception (in 1993) has always been the Couples for Christ Global Mission Foundation, Inc.

Finally, it is incorrect to refer to FFL as "CFC-FFL" as a motion has already been filed for FFL to cease usage of the CFC name, as FFL has separated from CFC.

Please use due diligence and Christian love, instead of initiating an all-out edit war.

God bless.

CFCYFCSOLID —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfcyfcsolid (talk • contribs) 00:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warring

I have this page on my watchlist for some reason and I can't help but notice the constant editing disputes.

Settle down, guys. A few issues:

Arguments over content disputes are not vandalism. Don't use the edit summary for slinging angry comments to this effect back and forth. Read WP:VANDAL to understand what IS vandalism.
Keep the 3 revert rule in mind or you'll probably find yourself blocked. I'm not saying I'm going to get you blocked, I'm just saying that edit warring gets noticed (recent changes, etc) and violations of 3RR typically result in a block
On that note: You really need to bring these content disputes to the talk page. Talk about what you should actually be writing, rather than just edit warring back and forth. Reach consensus, and then proceed. Sure you should be bold, but that doesn't mean it always works well. Settle down, slow down, discuss — TheBilly^(Talk) 23:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder. I apologize for being harsh on repeated edits with opinions and/or no cited sources. Hopefully such actions will be able to avoided by everyone in the future. Cfcyfcsolid (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and No Citations

I have some concern about the page lacking NPOV The statement seems copied verbatim from the www.cfcffl.org website. As for this entire article, none of it has any 3rd party information, leaving me to question the validity of the page as an article. I do not recommend the page for deletion, but bias must be removed. The visit www.cfcffl.com link of the bottom seems to make the article appear as an advertisement. Added primary sources tag to page. Lukeydukey (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the temp. edit block. hopefully this will solve the junk edit/etc. problem. Cfcyfcsolid (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 Added primary sources tag to page.
 [[User:Lukeydukey|Lukeydukey]] ([[User talk:Lukeydukey|talk]]) 22:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
+thanks for the temp. edit block. hopefully this will solve the junk edit/etc. problem. [[User:Cfcyfcsolid|Cfcyfcsolid]] ([[User talk:Cfcyfcsolid|talk]]) 16:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)