Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robofoot ÉPM: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Robofoot ÉPM. using TW
 
Jcmaco (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Robofoot ÉPM}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Robofoot ÉPM|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robofoot ÉPM]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robofoot ÉPM|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 15#{{anchorencode:Robofoot ÉPM}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|Robofoot ÉPM}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Robofoot ÉPM|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robofoot ÉPM]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robofoot ÉPM|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 15#{{anchorencode:Robofoot ÉPM}}|View log]])</noinclude>
looks like a standard university organization in the robotics field. as much as I love robotics and involved with [[WP:ROBO]] and [[WP:UNI]], this article does not seem to fulfill [[WP:ORG]] or our article guidelines set in [[WP:UNI]] [[User:Jamesontai|'''''<font face="Calibri" size="4px" color="#000066">- Jameson L. Tai</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Jamesontai|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesontai|contribs]]''</font></sup> 20:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
looks like a standard university organization in the robotics field. as much as I love robotics and involved with [[WP:ROBO]] and [[WP:UNI]], this article does not seem to fulfill [[WP:ORG]] or our article guidelines set in [[WP:UNI]] [[User:Jamesontai|'''''<font face="Calibri" size="4px" color="#000066">- Jameson L. Tai</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Jamesontai|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Jamesontai|contribs]]''</font></sup> 20:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
::'''Keep''' I believe the article is notable since the project has received considerable media coverage in Québec compared to other university organizations. You can have a look at this [http://robofoot.polymtl.ca/francais/medias.shtml page (in French)] which lists newspaper articles and television interviews about the project. Although, I am not sure if theses sources can be considered "secondary sources". --[[User:Jcmaco|Jcmaco]] ([[User talk:Jcmaco|talk]]) 02:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:48, 16 February 2008

Robofoot ÉPM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

looks like a standard university organization in the robotics field. as much as I love robotics and involved with WP:ROBO and WP:UNI, this article does not seem to fulfill WP:ORG or our article guidelines set in WP:UNI - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 20:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe the article is notable since the project has received considerable media coverage in Québec compared to other university organizations. You can have a look at this page (in French) which lists newspaper articles and television interviews about the project. Although, I am not sure if theses sources can be considered "secondary sources". --Jcmaco (talk) 02:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]