Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-02-25 Sterling Jewelers Inc.: Difference between revisions
Malachite84 (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{Medcabstatus <!-- Mediator, please change from new to open when accepted, to status closed when the case is closed. Remember to remove the mediation request messa...' |
Malachite84 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[User:Biodole]] and me, [[User:Malachite84|Malachite84]] ([[User talk:Malachite84|talk]]) 07:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Biodole]] and me, [[User:Malachite84|Malachite84]] ([[User talk:Malachite84|talk]]) 07:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
==== What's going on? ==== |
==== What's going on? ==== |
||
[[User:Biodole]] keeps adding in an unencyclopedic litigation section that is unneccesarily negative and misleading. Also, even when he/she noted a reference it was not an electronic reference. User is brand new, has no previous contributions, and no user or talk page. User does not use the talk page for this article. |
[[User:Biodole]] keeps adding in an unencyclopedic litigation section that is unneccesarily negative and misleading. Also, even when he/she noted a reference it was not an electronic reference. User is brand new, has no previous contributions, and no user or talk page. User does not use the talk page for this article. I am distressed over the obvious negative tone of this user's contribution and do not feel that it enhances the article in any way other than to "trash" the company. |
||
==== What would you like to change about that? ==== |
==== What would you like to change about that? ==== |
||
User is probably brand new at wikipedia and does not know that it is not the place for complaints or for extremely detailed descriptions of negative lawsuits against companies. I would like for there to be no litigation section on this article and would like [[User:Biodole]] to abide by wikipedia policy. |
User is probably brand new at wikipedia and does not know that it is not the place for complaints or for extremely detailed descriptions of negative lawsuits against companies. I would like for there to be no litigation section on this article and would like [[User:Biodole]] to abide by wikipedia policy. |
||
Revision as of 07:20, 25 February 2008
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Status | new |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab new cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|]]
Request details
Who are the involved parties?
User:Biodole and me, Malachite84 (talk) 07:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
What's going on?
User:Biodole keeps adding in an unencyclopedic litigation section that is unneccesarily negative and misleading. Also, even when he/she noted a reference it was not an electronic reference. User is brand new, has no previous contributions, and no user or talk page. User does not use the talk page for this article. I am distressed over the obvious negative tone of this user's contribution and do not feel that it enhances the article in any way other than to "trash" the company.
What would you like to change about that?
User is probably brand new at wikipedia and does not know that it is not the place for complaints or for extremely detailed descriptions of negative lawsuits against companies. I would like for there to be no litigation section on this article and would like User:Biodole to abide by wikipedia policy.