Jump to content

Schwarzschild radius: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Schwarzschild radius''' (sometimes historically referred to as the '''gravitational radius''') is a characteristic [[radius]] associated with every [[mass]]. It is the radius for a given mass where, if that mass could be compressed to fit within that radius, no known force or [[Degenerate matter|degeneracy pressure]] could stop it from continuing to collapse into a [[gravitational singularity]]. The term is used in [[physics]] and [[astronomy]], especially in the theory of [[gravitation]], [[general relativity]].
The ''Schwarzschild radius'' (sometimes historically referred to as the ''gravitational radius'') is a characteristic [[radius]] associated with every [[mass]]. It is the radius for a given mass where, if that mass could be compressed to fit within that radius, no known force or [[Degenerate matter|degeneracy pressure]] could stop it from continuing to collapse into a [[gravitational singularity]]. The term is used in [[physics]] and [[astronomy]], especially in the theory of [[gravitation]], [[general relativity]].


In 1916, [[Karl Schwarzschild]] obtained an exact solution<ref>K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", ''Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik'' (1916) pp 189.</ref><ref>K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Flussigkeit nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", ''Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik'' (1916) pp 424.</ref> to [[Einstein's field equation]]s for the gravitational field outside a non-rotating, spherically symmetric body (see [[Schwarzschild metric]]). The solution contained a term of the form <math>1/(2M-r)</math>; the value of <math>r</math> making this term singular has come to be known as the ''Schwarzschild radius''. The physical significance of this singularity, and whether this singularity could ever occur in nature, was debated for many decades, and a general acceptance of the possibility of a [[black hole]] did not occur until after [[World War II]].
In 1916, [[Karl Schwarzschild]] obtained an exact solution<ref>K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", ''Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik'' (1916) pp 189.</ref><ref>K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Flussigkeit nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", ''Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik'' (1916) pp 424.</ref> to [[Einstein's field equation]]s for the gravitational field outside a non-rotating, spherically symmetric body (see [[Schwarzschild metric]]). The solution contained a term of the form <math>1/(2M-r)</math>; the value of <math>r</math> making this term singular has come to be known as the ''Schwarzschild radius''. The physical significance of this singularity, and whether this singularity could ever occur in nature, was debated for many decades, and a general acceptance of the possibility of a [[black hole]] did not occur until after [[World War II]].

Revision as of 17:35, 1 March 2008

The Schwarzschild radius (sometimes historically referred to as the gravitational radius) is a characteristic radius associated with every mass. It is the radius for a given mass where, if that mass could be compressed to fit within that radius, no known force or degeneracy pressure could stop it from continuing to collapse into a gravitational singularity. The term is used in physics and astronomy, especially in the theory of gravitation, general relativity.

In 1916, Karl Schwarzschild obtained an exact solution[1][2] to Einstein's field equations for the gravitational field outside a non-rotating, spherically symmetric body (see Schwarzschild metric). The solution contained a term of the form ; the value of making this term singular has come to be known as the Schwarzschild radius. The physical significance of this singularity, and whether this singularity could ever occur in nature, was debated for many decades, and a general acceptance of the possibility of a black hole did not occur until after World War II.

The Schwarzschild radius of an object is proportional to the mass. Accordingly, the Sun has a Schwarzschild radius of approximately 3 km, while the Earth's is only about 9 mm.

An object smaller than its Schwarzschild radius is called a black hole. The surface at the Schwarzschild radius acts as an event horizon in a non-rotating body. (A rotating black hole operates slightly differently.) Neither light nor particles can escape through this surface from the region inside, hence the name "black hole". The Schwarzschild radius of the (currently hypothesized) Supermassive black hole at our Galactic Center is approximately 7.8 million km. The Schwarzschild radius of a sphere with a uniform density equal to the critical density is equal to the radius of the visible universe.[3]

Formula for the Schwarzschild radius

The Schwarzschild radius is proportional to the mass, with a proportionality constant involving the gravitational constant and the speed of light. The formula for the Schwarzschild radius can be found by setting the escape velocity to the speed of light, and is

where

is the Schwarzschild radius,
is the gravitational constant,
is the mass of the gravitating object, and
is the speed of light.

The proportionality constant, , can be approximated as 1.48×10−27 m/kg.

This can be extended to show that an object of any density can be large enough to fall within its own Schwarzschild radius,

where

is the volume of the object, and
is its density.

Note that although the result is correct, general relativity must be used to properly derive the Schwarzschild radius. It is only a coincidence that Newtonian physics produces the same result.

Classification by Schwarzschild radius

Supermassive black hole

If one accumulates matter of normal density (1000 kg/m³, for example, the density of water) up to about 150,000,000 times the mass of the Sun, such an accumulation will fall inside its own Schwarzschild radius and thus it would be a supermassive black hole of 150,000,000 solar masses (Supermassive black holes up to a few billion solar masses are thought to exist). The supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy (2.5 million solar masses) constitutes observationally the most convincing evidence for the existence of black holes in general. It is thought that large black holes like these don't form directly in one collapse of a cluster of stars. Instead they may start as a stellar-sized black hole and grow larger by the accretion of matter and other black holes. The larger the mass of a galaxy, the larger is the mass of the supermassive black hole in its center.

Stellar black hole

If one accumulates matter at nuclear density (the density of the nucleus of an atom, about 1018 kg/m³; neutron stars also reach this density), such an accumulation would fall within its own Schwarzschild radius at about 3 solar masses and thus would be a stellar black hole.

Primordial black hole

Conversely, a small mass has an extremely small Schwarzschild radius. A mass similar to Mount Everest has a Schwarzschild radius smaller than a nanometre. Its average density at that size would be so high that no known mechanism could form such extremely compact objects. Such black holes might possibly be formed in an early stage of the evolution of the universe, just after the Big Bang, when densities were extremely high. Therefore these hypothetical baby black holes are called primordial black holes.

History

The significance of the singularity at was first raised by Jacques Hadamard, who, during a conference in Paris in 1922, asked what might happen if a physical system could ever obtain this singularity. Albert Einstein insisted that it could not, pointing out the dire consequences for the universe, and jokingly referred to the singularity as the "Hadamard disaster".[4]

Schwarzschild's original model of a star assumed an incompressible fluid; Einstein pointed out that this was an unreasonable assumption, as sound waves would propagate at infinite speed. In his own work, Einstein reconsidered a model of a star where the components of the star were orbiting masses, and showed that the orbital velocities would exceed the speed of light at the Schwarzschild radius. In 1939, he used this to argue that no such thing can happen, and so the singularity could not occur in nature.[5] The same year, Robert Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder considered a model of a dust cloud, where the dust particles of the cloud were moving radially, towards a single point, and showed that the dust particles could reach the singularity in finite proper time. After passing the limit, Oppenheimer and Snyder noted that light cones were directed inwards, and that no signal could escape outside.[6]

See also

Classification of black holes by type:

A classification of black holes by mass:

References

  1. ^ K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik (1916) pp 189.
  2. ^ K. Schwarzschild, "Uber das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Flussigkeit nach der Einsteinschen Theorie", Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse fur Mathematik, Physik, und Technik (1916) pp 424.
  3. ^ F. Melia, "The Edge of Infinity: Supermassive Black Holes in the Universe," Cambridge University Press (2003) pp 124.
  4. ^ Hamed Moradi, "An Early History of Black Holes", (2004) Monash University
  5. ^ A. Einstein, "On a Stationary System with Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating Masses", Annals of Mathematics, (1939)
  6. ^ J.R. Oppenheimer, H. Snyder, "On Continued Gravitational Contraction", Physical Review 56 (1939) p455.