Jump to content

User talk:Aagon~enwiki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:





UPDATE: Regardless of my opinion on weather mission statements should be included in the encyclopedia, I am perfectly willing to go with the Wikipedia standard. I have put in a request for clarification on this. But looking at other Wikipedia articles on organizations, it seems the more well written ones do not rely on the mission statement.[[Special:Contributions/207.224.17.33|207.224.17.33]] ([[User talk:207.224.17.33|talk]]) 06:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Richprentice
UPDATE: Regardless of my opinion on weather mission statements should be included in the encyclopedia, I am perfectly willing to go with the Wikipedia standard. I have put in a request for clarification on this. But looking at other Wikipedia articles on organizations, it seems the more well written ones do not rely on the mission statement.[[User:Richprentice|Richprentice]] ([[User talk:Richprentice|talk]]) 06:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Richprentice

Revision as of 06:20, 6 March 2008

A few Wikipedia articles list mission statements, but that doesn't make it correct. This is an Encyclopedia in progress. Think about other encyclopedias- (World Book, etc) with rare exceptions, you will not find mission statements. This is because the mission statements purpose is to promote, and encyclopedias are not promotional. Besides, you can put all the information you want about what the organization does in the body of the article as long as it is specific and citable information. My purpose is not to outright delete things, thats why I am explaining in detail every edit I make. It would be easier just to revert, but I know that your edits are in good faith. Take the time and find specific articles to cite if you want to improve the body of the article. Remember, your purpose here is only to wright an encyclopedia. Your knowledge gained from your experience with this organization may be helpful in finding useful information, but Wikipedia rules does not allow you to incorporate your own knowledge into the article. Here is a link to reliable sources to help you find media coverage to form the basis of the article. Also, remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes. Richprentice (talk)Richprentice —Preceding comment was added at 02:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


UPDATE: Regardless of my opinion on weather mission statements should be included in the encyclopedia, I am perfectly willing to go with the Wikipedia standard. I have put in a request for clarification on this. But looking at other Wikipedia articles on organizations, it seems the more well written ones do not rely on the mission statement.Richprentice (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Richprentice[reply]