Non-Aristotelian logic: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Reinstate neutrosophic logic where it belongs to. |
Harry Potter (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Compare with: [[Non-monotonic logic]] where every statement is true or false, but not immutable. |
Compare with: [[Non-monotonic logic]] where every statement is true or false, but not immutable. |
||
Non-Aristotelian Philosphers: |
|||
*[[Stéphane Lupasco]] |
Revision as of 15:16, 30 November 2003
The term non-Aristotelian logic is used for any system of logic which does not divide statements into "true" and "false" statements, as opposed to Aristotle's two-valued system of logic.
See:
The concept of non-Aristotelian logic was used by A. E. van Vogt as the central theme in his World of Null-A novels, based on his interest in Alfred Korzybski's General Semantics.
One common interpretation of the theory of Bayesian probability is precisely that probabilities describe degrees of belief in propositions.
See also: Multi-valued logic for another article on this topic.
Compare with: Non-monotonic logic where every statement is true or false, but not immutable.
Non-Aristotelian Philosphers: