Jump to content

Non-Aristotelian logic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reinstate neutrosophic logic where it belongs to.
Harry Potter (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


Compare with: [[Non-monotonic logic]] where every statement is true or false, but not immutable.
Compare with: [[Non-monotonic logic]] where every statement is true or false, but not immutable.

Non-Aristotelian Philosphers:

*[[Stéphane Lupasco]]

Revision as of 15:16, 30 November 2003

The term non-Aristotelian logic is used for any system of logic which does not divide statements into "true" and "false" statements, as opposed to Aristotle's two-valued system of logic.

See:

The concept of non-Aristotelian logic was used by A. E. van Vogt as the central theme in his World of Null-A novels, based on his interest in Alfred Korzybski's General Semantics.

One common interpretation of the theory of Bayesian probability is precisely that probabilities describe degrees of belief in propositions.

See also: Multi-valued logic for another article on this topic.

Compare with: Non-monotonic logic where every statement is true or false, but not immutable.

Non-Aristotelian Philosphers: