Jump to content

Talk:Madelyn and Stanley Dunham: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: Line 10:
:The exact phrase has [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Free+Obama%27s+White+Grandmother%22&hl=en&rlz=1T4GGLJ_enUS228US228&start=10&sa=N 748 hits on google]. [[User:Americasroof|Americasroof]] ([[User talk:Americasroof|talk]]) 14:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
:The exact phrase has [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Free+Obama%27s+White+Grandmother%22&hl=en&rlz=1T4GGLJ_enUS228US228&start=10&sa=N 748 hits on google]. [[User:Americasroof|Americasroof]] ([[User talk:Americasroof|talk]]) 14:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
::''/shrug/''. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 02:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::''/shrug/''. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 02:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

== Neutrality of phrasing ==

This opinion piece is part of the 2008 Presidential campaign section:
''"Part of the controversy lies in the fact that if the reverse were the case (a white person used the phrase "typical black person"), it would be immediately and resoundingly condemned as racist"'' and most of the sources are POV conservative blogs. Does anyone else agree that this should be removed?--[[User:PilsnerUrquell|PilsnerUrquell]] ([[User talk:PilsnerUrquell|talk]]) 07:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:29, 22 March 2008

Only living ancestor

Madelyn is Barack's only living ancestor. There is some confusion with Sarah Obama who is a step-grandmother. Americasroof (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Free Obama's White Grandmother"

The article currently includes this:

An article by Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin ran under the headline "Free Obama's White Grandmother."[15]

Is this Andy Martin really someone whose opinion is noteworthy? He doesn't even have a Wikipedia page at the moment (although there's a redlink to him at Andy Martin). The inclusion of his view on Madelyn Dunham seems a bit odd to me. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 07:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The exact phrase has 748 hits on google. Americasroof (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
/shrug/. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 02:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of phrasing

This opinion piece is part of the 2008 Presidential campaign section: "Part of the controversy lies in the fact that if the reverse were the case (a white person used the phrase "typical black person"), it would be immediately and resoundingly condemned as racist" and most of the sources are POV conservative blogs. Does anyone else agree that this should be removed?--PilsnerUrquell (talk) 07:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]