Jump to content

Talk:Notonectidae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DrakeKobra (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArthropodTalk|Start|low}}
{{ArthropodTalk|Start|low}}
==Merge==
==Merge==
I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think [[Back swimmer]] should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)so do i but ya so wat did u say??? poo
I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think [[Back swimmer]] should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)so do i but ya so wat did u say???


== Disagree ==
== Disagree ==

Revision as of 14:42, 22 March 2008

WikiProject iconArthropods Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge

I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think Back swimmer should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? NickelShoe 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)so do i but ya so wat did u say???[reply]

Disagree

No, they shouldn't be merged. 13:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)