Talk:Notonectidae: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
DrakeKobra (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
DrakeKobra (talk | contribs) irrelevant post edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArthropodTalk|Start|low}} |
{{ArthropodTalk|Start|low}} |
||
==Merge== |
==Merge== |
||
I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think [[Back swimmer]] should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think [[Back swimmer]] should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Disagree == |
== Disagree == |
Revision as of 14:45, 22 March 2008
Arthropods Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Merge
I think it's obvious the two articles should be merged, but I think Back swimmer should be the target. Are people really going to search for the scientific name? Is there a precedent for using scientific names as the title? NickelShoe 05:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Disagree
No, they shouldn't be merged. 13:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)