Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monova: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:38, 22 March 2008

Monova

Non notable company, tagged as G11 and prod'd both removed by single purpose account who makes nothing but links to this company. I see notability issues, advertising and conflict of interest. Torchwood Who? (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. Paddy Simcox (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The company clearly exists but so what? Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Non notable company, tagged as G11 and prod'd both removed by single purpose account who makes nothing but links to this company. I see notability issues, advertising and conflict of interest. [[User:Torchwoodwho|Torchwood Who?]] ([[User talk:Torchwoodwho|talk]]) 10:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' as spam. [[User:Paddy Simcox|Paddy Simcox]] ([[User talk:Paddy Simcox|talk]]) 14:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' &mdash; The company clearly exists.  If you have a problem with the CONTENT of the article, the proper solution is not to delete it but ''fix it up''.  If you can't be bothered to do that, fine, but that's no need to go trying to nuke it altogether.  Just because you're not interested doesn't mean no one else is.  [[User:Kmweber|Kurt Weber]] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 15:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' &mdash; The company clearly exists but so what?   [[User:Kmweber|Kurt Weber]] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 15:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)