User talk:😂

User:^demon

Archives
From Humble Beginnings December 2005 - May 2006 Getting involved, making MedCom June 2006 - November 2006 Chairman. Bot Operator. Sysop. December 2006 - May 2007 A deletionist rogue to making it simple June 2007 - CURRENT

Removing instance of image HeaderV2 04.jpg that has been speedily deleted per (CSD I4)

You did a speedy delete of this image under the guidelines that a soruces wasn't specified. However, it was specified that the image came from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration‎ Department of Communication. This is a U.S. federal property, and therefore free-domain. The link to the image as host by the federal agency: http://www.samhsa.gov/images/header2006/headerV2_04.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amiaheroyet (talk • contribs) 19:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done. My mistake, and I apologize. I must've not seen that URL on the page either, it's been a busy week :(. I've also tagged it with {{commons ok}}, so it can be moved there and be utilized across projects. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 02:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

I would like to know WHY my articles on Space Impact Kappa Base, Block Breaker: Deluxe and Hooked On: Creatures of the Deep were deleted DESPITE me rewriting all of the added Features using my own words?? Did you even bother checking the content first? Because I had one more article with the same "problem" and it obviously turned out fine once I made the change - seeing as how the user Dweller removed the copyvio-tag and left that one intact.

If there was still something wrong about the articles - then DO point out WHAT so that I can take further actions as I now try to recover them... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ConraDargo (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright is more than just the exact words being used. If we just took other sources and rewrote their material in our own words, it would still be a copyright issue. You need to compose neutral and non-advertising type language that is backed up (but not merely rewritten from) reliable independent 3rd party sources. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 02:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleting images

You have recently deleted some photos from aircraft articles on the basis of no fair use justification. While I accept that policy demands that fair use images need a proper justification, no warning was provided on the articles talk page before they were deleted - if this was done then it may have been possible for someone to provide a proper fair use justification (or even a free license) before the image needed to be deleted. I know the image uploader normally gets notified of impending image deletion, but he or she may not be active and may not be the best person to give a proper justification or better license. Notifying the talk pages of the articles that use the images could be helpful here.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I understand where you're coming from on that. I must admit, I do not always check behind to ensure proper notification is given (it is so often, I get lazy and forget to check sometimes). Notifying the talk pages is more likely to garner the correct response, as opposed to an editor who might've left. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 16:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Of course what would really be handy would be some notification on the article's talk pages of problems with Commons Images before they just disappear. Nigel Ish (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I wish there was greater inter-project communication so things like that wouldn't happen. But what can you do? ^demon^{[omg plz]} 23:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Followup on deletion of "Object-oriented magick"

Hi, ^demon. When you deleted Object-oriented magic, you may have missed that there was a second identical article at Object-Oriented_Magick. User:IceCreamAntisocial had requested that both be considered together. Thanks! Justin Eiler (talk) 22:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Missed that, sorry. Done now. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 11:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Categorization progress/Part1

A tag has been placed on Template:Categorization progress/Part1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion.

Hello Demon, I've chosen you on the list of administrator's because I liked your username best. It wasn't bubbly and bubbly is totally not my thing. Anyway, my article was deleted and I would like to to be reinstated. My article was about my website XOParrots.com The website is very popular, we have thousands of members and we are a very large organization. We have ties to most bird communities around the world, we have even rescued birds in the name of the website. We are here to teach others about parrot ownership and we help people daily.

Lexhatesyou (talk) 08:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)