Jump to content

User talk:Tone/Archive 10: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 60: Line 60:
== Propaganda checker ==
== Propaganda checker ==


Check this : [[User talk:Beamathan]]--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] ([[User talk:Hipi Zhdripi|talk]]) 22:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
#Check this : [[User talk:Beamathan]]--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] ([[User talk:Hipi Zhdripi|talk]]) 22:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

#Adinistrator [[User:ChrisO]] is maken and covering propagander´s--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] ([[User talk:Hipi Zhdripi|talk]]) 23:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:43, 31 March 2008

Comment

Welcome to my discussion page. I prefer having all the conversations on the same place, so I mostly answer here. -- Tone.
Click here to leave me a new message

Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (until 7th of April 2006)
Archive 2 (until 14th of May 2006)
Archive 3 (until 4th of June 2006)
Archive 4 (until 7th of October 2006)
Archive 5 (until 4th of January 2007)
Archive 6 (until 6th of May 2007)
Archive 7 (until 28th of June 2007)
Archive 8 (until 21th of December 2007)
Archive 9 (until 30th of March 2008)

Slovenia taskforce

Well yes the purpose is to have a log of missing articles this is why I create lists but yes a category is better although a category can't give the birth and death dates or a summary. Its just lists of people have sprung up all over wikipedia and I didn't want Slovenia to be left out. Perhaps the task force could discuss copying the slovenian bio lists from slovenian wikipedia into the task force rather than the mainspace? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 17:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I'll do is tag the new stubs I create with Template:Expand Slovenia which puts new stubs in Category:Slovenian articles needing translation so this way the project has a log of recently created articles which may require a bit of expansion to become acceptable. They don['t have to be expanded much but at least a little bit of knowledge added to them. I sure wish I could speak the language ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 17:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if tagging new stubs is the best idea, I'd prefer having a list of those on the taskforce site. Or even better, to use tempaltes on talkpages with assessment on the quality scale (so we get them sorted). And it would be nice to check, how many FA and GA are there already and what articles are close to that. I remember Olm at the moment, maybe there're more. As for the lists, there are good lists and bad lists, I still haven't found a perfect way to deal with them. Anyway... at least we are moving forward. --Tone 18:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I see it as a way forward. I have no problems if the lists are moved to the project space Believe you me I'd rather create full articles but it isn't possible to begin with because of the language barrier. I'll trust the judgement of yourselves for notability and will only create stubs if I believe they can be expanded and are indeed notable enough. I think you should be pleased that things are developing ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 18:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly I am very happy with recent development. You did a great work with initiating the project. Hm, some time ago I created Portal:Slovenia that is now stagnating, maybe we could include it somewhere? --Tone 18:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway the recently created article category is linked on the project main page as a request for expansion ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 18:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it really is good to see that several editors such as yourself and the others are on the ball, and are also capable individuals who are able to root out the articles which aren't notable. Lets hope coverage and quality can increase in due course. Regards ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 18:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:-) As you have noticed, we are having a discussion on three talkpages (we two and Viator). Maybe we should discuss issues, that are relevant to the project on the taskforce talkpage... I'll add that thing about wuality rating to the page as well. --Tone 18:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Comment

The reason I reverted User:Jovanvb's edits is because this user didn't discuss these changes with other users before editing , he only placed a note saying it was POV so he is removing the flag and coat of Arms for NPOV (as well as the name ) , even if this edit was neutral it should have been discussed first, right ?As for the bilingual names : they were bilingual but User:Ev removed them ( see the diff here ) , cheers --Cradel 17:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This debates get overheated too quickly, I know how hard it is to stay calm. Well, we try our best... Curious about bilingual names, I'll think about it. Cheers. --Tone 18:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of CubeDesktop

Any clue about why was the article deleted? Halfelf2000xp (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was a result of deletion discussion here. Regards. --Tone 20:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda checker

  1. Check this : User talk:Beamathan--Hipi Zhdripi (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Adinistrator User:ChrisO is maken and covering propagander´s--Hipi Zhdripi (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]