User talk:Rabbitfast: Difference between revisions
Rabbitfast (talk | contribs) |
Rabbitfast (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
:Thanks for the vote of confidence :)I'm trying to prevent the Boom-Bust scenario. I'm just not sure how much I can get |
:Thanks for the vote of confidence :)I'm trying to prevent the Boom-Bust scenario. I'm just not sure how much I can get |
||
:done over the weekend as I have to finish writing a paper for another class by Tuesday. --[[User:Rabbitfast|Rabbitfast]] ([[User talk:Rabbitfast#top|talk]]) 08:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Well, I came here to leave you a barnstar, and found you'd already got one! Well deserved, too. I am working on the copyedit of [[Latin American Boom]] but I have to go out this evening and it may not be done till tomorrow; I'll see what I can get done. I think I'll have a few prose issues, but the main thing I wanted to say is that the article is in very good shape. I think all the right material is there, and there are a lot of citations; it's close to GA and I will see what I can do to push it over the boundary for you. Congratulations on some excellent work -- I look forward to seeing this get even better. I think after the GA you're definitely in striking distance of an FA nomination; we still have six days so if we can get this through GA this weekend I think you can do it. More later -- [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] [[User_talk:Mike Christie|(talk)]] 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
Well, I came here to leave you a barnstar, and found you'd already got one! Well deserved, too. I am working on the copyedit of [[Latin American Boom]] but I have to go out this evening and it may not be done till tomorrow; I'll see what I can get done. I think I'll have a few prose issues, but the main thing I wanted to say is that the article is in very good shape. I think all the right material is there, and there are a lot of citations; it's close to GA and I will see what I can do to push it over the boundary for you. Congratulations on some excellent work -- I look forward to seeing this get even better. I think after the GA you're definitely in striking distance of an FA nomination; we still have six days so if we can get this through GA this weekend I think you can do it. More later -- [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] [[User_talk:Mike Christie|(talk)]] 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:14, 5 April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
RE message
Thanks for your note - the comments about signing talk pages and using edit summaries in the Welcome message I left aren't aimed at you in particular, they're just included in the template I used ({{w-graphical}}). Now I've re-read it more critically, although it's good advice that first paragraph does come over as a bit abrupt... maybe I'll switch to something different in the future! Anyway, please don't think I was in any way intending to criticise or 'lay down the law', I just wanted to make you feel welcome :P
Looking forward to working with your project, and if you have any questions at all don't hesitate to get in touch. All the best, EyeSereneTALK 10:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The Novels Project is a Wikipedia group dedicated to improving the quality of articles on novels. If you would like to help, please consider joining: seeWikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
yes!
This is the kind of edit summary I like to see. :) --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 07:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Encouragement
![]() |
The Working Woman's Barnstar | |
I know you're ploughing a bit of a lonely furrow there at Latin American Boom. This is a bit of encouragement: you're doing a good job! jbmurray (talk|contribs) 20:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the vote of confidence :)I'm trying to prevent the Boom-Bust scenario. I'm just not sure how much I can get
- done over the weekend as I have to finish writing a paper for another class by Tuesday. --Rabbitfast (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, I came here to leave you a barnstar, and found you'd already got one! Well deserved, too. I am working on the copyedit of Latin American Boom but I have to go out this evening and it may not be done till tomorrow; I'll see what I can get done. I think I'll have a few prose issues, but the main thing I wanted to say is that the article is in very good shape. I think all the right material is there, and there are a lot of citations; it's close to GA and I will see what I can do to push it over the boundary for you. Congratulations on some excellent work -- I look forward to seeing this get even better. I think after the GA you're definitely in striking distance of an FA nomination; we still have six days so if we can get this through GA this weekend I think you can do it. More later -- Mike Christie (talk) 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you! The encouragement is greatly appreciated :)--Rabbitfast (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)