User talk:Dorftrottel: Difference between revisions
→On Kmweber: new section |
Dorftrottel (talk | contribs) →On Kmweber: re |
||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
Dorftrottel, could you please cease on making sarcastic references and/or replies to Kurt's regular self-nom oppositioning reason at RfA? This issue has been hashed and rehashed for nearly a year now in every relevant talk page and dispute resolution forum as to his standard replies for such RfAs. Kurt will not change his mind, and the community has agreed that his decision is to be respected in good faith and let bureaucrats judge the weight and validity of the opinion in determining consensus. Such poking at his comments is a distraction from the discussion of the user at hand. A personal request to consider, happy editing to you. [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 06:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
Dorftrottel, could you please cease on making sarcastic references and/or replies to Kurt's regular self-nom oppositioning reason at RfA? This issue has been hashed and rehashed for nearly a year now in every relevant talk page and dispute resolution forum as to his standard replies for such RfAs. Kurt will not change his mind, and the community has agreed that his decision is to be respected in good faith and let bureaucrats judge the weight and validity of the opinion in determining consensus. Such poking at his comments is a distraction from the discussion of the user at hand. A personal request to consider, happy editing to you. [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 06:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:No thanks. As long as RfA is a discussion, I will continue to express my opinion on the validity of other people's reasonings. [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]] ([[User talk:Dorftrottel|troll]]) 06:39, [[April 10]], 200<!--DT-->8 |
Revision as of 06:39, 10 April 2008
Template:Override{| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="2" style="width: 100%; margin-bottom:0px; border: none; background-color:#92775d; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius:8px;" |
No RfA spam please. Everybody else: Welcome.
I have no particular agenda on how to handle user talk (except for this simple rule). I'm confident we'll figure a way to get the essential points across to each other anyway. Chances are, I'll reply on your talk page and watch it for a reply from you. If you'd rather put it here to avoid a fragmented discussion, you're welcome to copy anything over together with your latest reply. Also, please don't hold back: Nobody is perfect and I'm grateful for any constructive criticism and advice you may have with regard to specific edits or my conduct in general.
(please remember to provide a subject/headline and to sign your post with four tildes: ~~~~ )
Cleaning up my attics
Hi, can you help compress User:Lenticel/Articles (compress the DYK's to simply state the date and the article name, I'll follow that format for newer DYK's), User:Lenticel/Barnstars (make them mini-barnstars) and User:Lenticel/Userboxes (make it more than one column to make it eat less space) Thanks --Lenticel (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing my attics!--Lenticel (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
good reason for deletion
the first sentence at [1]. convinced even me. DGG (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Reverting
Heh, I'm using Huggle and it's really easy to use. Sunderland06 21:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
New humorous subpage
I was thinking of giving you something in return in fixing my pages so I think I'll simply give you an idea that would replace the WP:Screambox. I was thinking of Wikipick-up lines. It will be the community's help for those who gave so much of their time in Wikipedia that the chances of them getting mate is getting less than zero. Perhaps Keeper and you can formulate one on your user subpage. I'm not romantically successful so you're on your own here--Lenticel (talk) 10:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's very nice of you to want to return the favour, but actually I have never had a shortage of shit ideas in my head (the latest being a practical wake-up call to what doing harm to Wikipedia often looks like, at least in my opinion), nor do I have a shortage in girlfriends. Dorftrottel (troll) 13:20, April 9, 2008
On Kmweber
Dorftrottel, could you please cease on making sarcastic references and/or replies to Kurt's regular self-nom oppositioning reason at RfA? This issue has been hashed and rehashed for nearly a year now in every relevant talk page and dispute resolution forum as to his standard replies for such RfAs. Kurt will not change his mind, and the community has agreed that his decision is to be respected in good faith and let bureaucrats judge the weight and validity of the opinion in determining consensus. Such poking at his comments is a distraction from the discussion of the user at hand. A personal request to consider, happy editing to you. Keegantalk 06:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- No thanks. As long as RfA is a discussion, I will continue to express my opinion on the validity of other people's reasonings. Dorftrottel (troll) 06:39, April 10, 2008