Jump to content

Talk:Playing God (ethics): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


:"Playing" is an adverb, therefore "God" can't be used in the form of a proper noun. It should remain "god".
:"Playing" is an adverb, therefore "God" can't be used in the form of a proper noun. It should remain "god".


:: The word "god" normally implies one of many, IE when talking about the god of one religion as opposed to another, or in a religion with multiple gods. Capitalized "God" refers to a single god, or the general concept of an all powerful "thing", no matter the religion. For example you could talk about what Muslums think about "God", even though they don't call him "God", because in English "God" is more than a name, it refers to any "main god". Sort of like "mother" and "father" can be used as names, although they're not person-specific. In the same way, Einstein talked of "God" as the universe, IE in a non-religous sense (not a personal god). Therefore I think "God" (capitalized) is appropriate. [[Special:Contributions/99.246.109.131|99.246.109.131]] ([[User talk:99.246.109.131|talk]]) 21:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:10, 11 April 2008

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Ethics

should this page be merged with a new page that could be called Artificial Selection? Inferno 05:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page doesn't mention what has most recently become the biggest thing closest to playing God in the American public's eye: Cloning. Abortion is also considered playing God.

Done! --->| SUB-Z3R0 |<--- 08:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

I would support the move. -Switch t 18:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would not support the move. -Level27 XXXXX 21:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.169.165 (talk) [reply]

Capitalize "God"

The expression "playing God" arises specifically in comparing the actions of an individual with the Judeo-Christian God, doesn't it? Lowercase gods like Zeus and Odin aren't closely tied to things like, say, creating life--as Frankenstein did when playing God. The God in "playing God" seems to usually be capitalized; in Wikipedia itself, most links to this page (as well as non-linked references to "playing God") capitalize "God."

I recommend this article be renamed "Playing God."

Amccune


"Playing" is an adverb, therefore "God" can't be used in the form of a proper noun. It should remain "god".


The word "god" normally implies one of many, IE when talking about the god of one religion as opposed to another, or in a religion with multiple gods. Capitalized "God" refers to a single god, or the general concept of an all powerful "thing", no matter the religion. For example you could talk about what Muslums think about "God", even though they don't call him "God", because in English "God" is more than a name, it refers to any "main god". Sort of like "mother" and "father" can be used as names, although they're not person-specific. In the same way, Einstein talked of "God" as the universe, IE in a non-religous sense (not a personal god). Therefore I think "God" (capitalized) is appropriate. 99.246.109.131 (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]