Jump to content

Talk:Francis William Reitz/Comments: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with 'Upgraded quality from Stub to B in conformity with independent rating to B in ProjectBiography.~~~~'
 
GAList2
Line 1: Line 1:
Upgraded quality from Stub to B in conformity with independent rating to B in ProjectBiography.[[User:Makeshift Thackery|Makeshift Thackery]] ([[User talk:Makeshift Thackery|talk]]) 14:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Upgraded quality from Stub to B in conformity with independent rating to B in ProjectBiography.[[User:Makeshift Thackery|Makeshift Thackery]] ([[User talk:Makeshift Thackery|talk]]) 14:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review – see [[WP:WIAGA]] for criteria'''
{{#if:|<hr width=50%>{{{overcom}}}|}}
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
#:A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{1acom}}}|}}
#:B. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] compliance: {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{1bcom}}}|}}
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''?
#:A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|{{{2a}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|{{{2b}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}
#:C. [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|{{{2c}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{2ccom}}}|}}
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
#:A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|{{{3a}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{3acom}}}|}}
#:B. Focused: {{GAList/check|{{{3b}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
#:Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|{{{4}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
#Is it '''stable'''?
#: No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|{{{5}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
#Does it '''contain [[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: {{GAList/check|{{{6a}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{6acom}}}|}}
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|{{{6b}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|{{{7}}}}}
#:: {{#if:|{{{7com}}}|}}

Revision as of 08:34, 16 April 2008

Upgraded quality from Stub to B in conformity with independent rating to B in ProjectBiography.Makeshift Thackery (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: