Talk:Formalism (literature): Difference between revisions
→First sentence: new section |
→First sentence: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Is it just me, or is that the most poorly worded opening sentence ever? That 'how' needs removing, or a second clause with a verb needs adding. [[Special:Contributions/129.12.200.49|129.12.200.49]] ([[User talk:129.12.200.49|talk]]) 15:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
Is it just me, or is that the most poorly worded opening sentence ever? That 'how' needs removing, or a second clause with a verb needs adding. [[Special:Contributions/129.12.200.49|129.12.200.49]] ([[User talk:129.12.200.49|talk]]) 15:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== First sentence == |
|||
Is it just me, or is that the most poorly worded opening sentence ever? That 'how' needs removing, or a second clause with a verb needs adding. [[Special:Contributions/129.12.200.49|129.12.200.49]] ([[User talk:129.12.200.49|talk]]) 15:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:16, 17 April 2008
This entry should be expanded; I will do so myself in the next couple of weeks.RobinJ 21:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Make that (ahem) the next several weeks. RobinJ 20:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
CRUDE versions of marxism? From the standpoint of historical materialism, the development literature should indeed be determined by material and social conditions. I believe that most marxists, also those who reject the vulgar marxism and materialism of plekhanov and lenin would agree with that. /Anonymous
First sentence
Is it just me, or is that the most poorly worded opening sentence ever? That 'how' needs removing, or a second clause with a verb needs adding. 129.12.200.49 (talk) 15:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
First sentence
Is it just me, or is that the most poorly worded opening sentence ever? That 'how' needs removing, or a second clause with a verb needs adding. 129.12.200.49 (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)