Jump to content

Talk:Mainstream economics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
I think, and many scholars agree, that the Austrian School of Economics is the precursor of the Chicago school of economics (Considered today as the ultimate mainstream).
I think, and many scholars agree, that the Austrian School of Economics is the precursor of the Chicago school of economics (Considered today as the ultimate mainstream).


::Check out [[Austrian School]]. Its main link is through its emphasis on pricing theory and its "radical" free market philosophy. But whereas Austrians can sometimes seem to border on support of [[anarchism]], the Chicago school really doesn't attack the State in quite the same way. Certainly many disciples of [[Ludwig von Mises]] and (particularly) [[Murray Rothbard]] would be appalled by the Chicago School's rejection of the [[gold standard]] as a topic of serious academic study. And Austrians do not talk to fiat-currency-supporting [[monetarist]]s, who are close cousins of the Chicago School. Austrian economics basically got cut off from Chicago after Rothbard and now forms a small cul de sac in economic theory, without much (or indeed any) mainstream academic funding or support. Chicago School (and the associated [[Washington Consensus]]) do receive generous funding from many institutional and government sources.--[[User:Lagrandebanquesucre|Lagrandebanquesucre]] ([[User talk:Lagrandebanquesucre|talk]]) 10:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
::Check out [[Austrian School]]. Its main link is through its emphasis on pricing theory and its "radical" free market philosophy. But whereas Austrians can sometimes seem to be borderline [[anarchist]]s, the Chicago school really doesn't attack the State in quite the same way. Certainly many disciples of [[Ludwig von Mises]] and (particularly) [[Murray Rothbard]] would be appalled by the Chicago School's rejection of the [[gold standard]] as a topic of serious academic study. And many (most?) Austrians do not talk to fiat-currency-supporting [[monetarist]]s, who are close cousins of the Chicago School. Austrian economics basically got cut off from Chicago after Rothbard and now forms a small cul de sac in economic theory, without much (or indeed any) mainstream academic funding or support. Chicago School (and the associated [[Washington Consensus]]) do receive generous funding from many institutional and government sources.--[[User:Lagrandebanquesucre|Lagrandebanquesucre]] ([[User talk:Lagrandebanquesucre|talk]]) 10:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:50, 7 May 2008

WikiProject iconEconomics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is Ausrian Economics Really Heterodox???

I think, and many scholars agree, that the Austrian School of Economics is the precursor of the Chicago school of economics (Considered today as the ultimate mainstream).

Check out Austrian School. Its main link is through its emphasis on pricing theory and its "radical" free market philosophy. But whereas Austrians can sometimes seem to be borderline anarchists, the Chicago school really doesn't attack the State in quite the same way. Certainly many disciples of Ludwig von Mises and (particularly) Murray Rothbard would be appalled by the Chicago School's rejection of the gold standard as a topic of serious academic study. And many (most?) Austrians do not talk to fiat-currency-supporting monetarists, who are close cousins of the Chicago School. Austrian economics basically got cut off from Chicago after Rothbard and now forms a small cul de sac in economic theory, without much (or indeed any) mainstream academic funding or support. Chicago School (and the associated Washington Consensus) do receive generous funding from many institutional and government sources.--Lagrandebanquesucre (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]