Jump to content

User talk:Delicious carbuncle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎ASUIsTalking: citations don't dispel the smell of advertising
Tcalcagni (talk | contribs)
Line 99: Line 99:
[[User:ReggieGorilla|ReggieGorilla]] ([[User talk:ReggieGorilla|talk]]) 21:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[[User:ReggieGorilla|ReggieGorilla]] ([[User talk:ReggieGorilla|talk]]) 21:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
:It was written like ad copy (less so now that you've trimmed it) and the only reference that is linked is self-published. The speedy appears to have been declined, so it's a moot point. Judging solely from your contributions, I would suspect that you're associated with the parent PR firm. If so, you should probably read [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:SPAM]]. Thanks. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle#top|talk]]) 01:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:It was written like ad copy (less so now that you've trimmed it) and the only reference that is linked is self-published. The speedy appears to have been declined, so it's a moot point. Judging solely from your contributions, I would suspect that you're associated with the parent PR firm. If so, you should probably read [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:SPAM]]. Thanks. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle#top|talk]]) 01:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== Deletion of Thomas Calcagni ==

May I ask why after others added valid references to this listing you decided to delete it anyway? I did not realize I was supposed to communicate with you directly on this subject. I did not add any information to the article as you seemed to reject additions from me. Is reconsideration possible as a lot of the deletes were listed before others added references? Thank you --[[User:Tcalcagni|Tcalcagni]] ([[User talk:Tcalcagni|talk]]) 15:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:49, 13 May 2008

Template:Archive box collapsable

Autobytel

You tagged an earlier version of Autobytel for speedy deletion. I wanted to let you know that I found some useful references about the company and added them to the article. I think the article now establishes notability. --Eastmain (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. You do good work! Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Common Short Code

Hi, I was wondering if you could help me understand how my company can be listed as a provider of wireless infrastructure solutions, inlcuding a common short code gateway.

Thanks, Kimberly Kimberlyhaas (talk) 14:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:COI and WP:CORP. They should explain why I reverted your additions. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of page Dara Guiney

Hello, I have edited and included links and source reference. This should meet criteria now. Please advise if this is not the case. Disclaim (talk) 18:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel that the reference establishes notability per WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. The speedy delete was (barely) declined, so I've sent it for discussion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wtf?!

ummm...I didn't vandalize a page..it was MY page that I created..and i edited it...that isnt vandalism .......can u not.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiiippiiiee (talkcontribs) 20:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You re-added the phone numbers that another editor had correctly removed. Moot point since the page is gone now, but no page on WP is "MY page". Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
okay, clearly you're an idiot/ass hole the phone number (not numberS..) was part of the article, did you not read it? basically thats what the article is about. i realize its a moot point; my page meaning i made it, its not like i was going around posting random shit on pages that other people created, you said "please stop vandalizing pages" as if i was. it was relevant to the article, and it annoys me that it was deleted. lighten up a bit, huh?
p.s. note how like fifty other people have complained about this same sort of thing... i am simply not a fan of yours. who are you anyways..? Hiiippiiiee (talk) 03:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see someone's already warned you about civility so I won't bother. Lighten up a bit? You seem to be still angry about an article that got deleted yesterday. Take some time and learn how WP works, then your articles might not get deleted. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
no, i'm not angry i don't get angry. its just weird how seriously you are taking this. get a life. peace and love. bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiiippiiiee (talkcontribs) 03:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snow

Hi, recently you edited one of my edits and u said that it was incorrect. However, my teacher told me that when the temperature is at zero degrees, then snow begings to turn into a slushy substance. Therefore, that is why i added it. However, you said that it was inccorect so can you please tell me then what temperature makes snow turn into ice?

Thanks! and btw, I am kinda new so i didn't know you had to put references for every single edit.--Wanning Scores (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair question. The whole section including your edit reads "Slush: Snow which partially melts upon reaching the ground, to the point that it accumulates in puddles of partially-frozen water. This event generally occurs at 0°C or 32°F." It is incorrect in the sense that the temperature (and hence the event) will not generally occur at that specific temperature, but will occur at any temperature above that melting point. This will usually be at temperatures above 0°C, but solar radiation can cause snow to melt even if the ambient air temperature is below 0°C. Your teacher is not wrong, your statement was just too specific. Thanks for asking. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Quiet

Sorry, but I cannot access the deleted page so I don't know what it was like. I'll try my best to monitor him, and his contributions from now on. Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 03:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a recreation of a page deleted at AfD, and then a re-recreation after being warned, so the content isn't really the issue. I see you're taking a "wikibreak", so perhaps you should let someone else adopt this user, as you don't seem to have the time. Judging by edits like this one, Chicken Quiet (talk · contribs) would probably benefit from some guidance. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then, you go ahead and adopt him. Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 05:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I had the time and patience to "adopt" someone, I would have joined the adoption project, as you did. Other people offered to help the user at the same time that you did, perhaps one of them would adopt. I'm sorry if I offended you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um... Excuse me?

Did you even the "please don't tag this article" hidden message? I just started it like 10 minutes ago, and I have the intention of expanding it. If it's the "non-tagged" aspect of it, I'm sorry but I don't know how to sort. Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 21:54:55

Can you give me some context? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This was the hidden message <!-- THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT A REAL GAME WHICH HAS NOT YET BEEN RELEASED. PLEASE DO NOT DELETE ON THE Non-notable premise WITHOUT CONSULTATION. --> and um the website is http://ascendedgames.com/index.shtml and it's a legitimate company. I think it's notable because it's a video game that's going to be released (meaning it hasn't been yet, and how well known can it get until after it's been released?). Did you want me to tag the article with that relevance scale thingy? Is that it? Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 22:13:27
Ok, you're talking about Dragon Treasures (it would have been helpful if you'd said that somewhere). This will come as a surprise to you, but I didn't even see your hidden message because it was, well, hidden. Please read WP:NOTABILITY. An unreleased video has very little chance of being notable unless it's something like Halo3 or GTA4 which are preceded by months of hype and speculation. Sorry. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so I've got to let it get deleted so I can write it again in a year? Wow there's so much beuocracy here it's disturbing. Um, it's got http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=QobUAY4Y9WM and http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=96f4Zc6iT_k if that helps any. It might not have been so annoying if you'd waited more than seven minutes before A7'ing it though though Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 22:25:57
And just in case it wasn't a typo, it's a video game not a video. Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 22:28:02
Sorry, that's how it works. Please don't come here being belligerent because the (as yet nonexistent) game you chose to create an article about isn't notable. That's not my fault. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um... Yeah it's existent, it's being scripted. So any particular reason that it has to be deleted? Can't we just tag it as non-notable? If it's so non notable, then why would anyone create an article on it? Why have I heard about it when I live in Britian and don't have a clue in bloody h*** more about the inventor than what was provided online? Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 22:36:08

Please stop leaving me messages about this. Read the guideline I provided you earlier. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, you "win" if that's what you wanted. Yamakiri TC § 05-8-2008 • 22:39:15

Thank you--Star-in-law (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why Delicious carbuncle?

Why did you delete my edits on Selena Gomez's page??? I look them up on the computer and they were all true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Addisonn. (talkcontribs) 20:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The COOKIE MONSTeR ate the cow

. Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 01:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie!! It's welcome even without the milk! Hope your exams go/are going/went well. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trashforming

yeah you purposed deletion of Trashforming, is it because i don't have sources? because it is not somthing made up, in Dayton Ohio it is becoming more and more popular. 01:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

While I admit that Dayton is pretty much the center of the musical world, you need to add some sources to substantiate the article. Google has about 20 hits for this term and none of them are music related. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

inercance

hi delicious carbuncle with the help of my new freinds realist2 and RGOODERMOTE my innosense has been found and I will learnt o make more contributions for michael please understand I do not want to upset anyone i just want the truth to come out I HAVE ALWAYS LOVED MICHAEL since I was very young

perhaps we can now work togeher to make wikipedia a better place! SDLexington (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really very sorry about the misunderstanding. I realise that you are not the troll I thought you were. I encourage you to resume editing Michael Jackson now. I'm sure your new friends will appreciate your help. Best regards. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


ASUIsTalking

Good afternoon Delicious Carbuncle. I have made a few changes to the ASUIsTalking article. I was curious to see why you had marked it for speedy deletion. All of the information that has been placed on the page was taken from newspaper articles and mentions from radio programs. The publications that were cited were all accredited.

Thanks.

ReggieGorilla (talk) 21:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was written like ad copy (less so now that you've trimmed it) and the only reference that is linked is self-published. The speedy appears to have been declined, so it's a moot point. Judging solely from your contributions, I would suspect that you're associated with the parent PR firm. If so, you should probably read WP:COI and WP:SPAM. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Thomas Calcagni

May I ask why after others added valid references to this listing you decided to delete it anyway? I did not realize I was supposed to communicate with you directly on this subject. I did not add any information to the article as you seemed to reject additions from me. Is reconsideration possible as a lot of the deletes were listed before others added references? Thank you --Tcalcagni (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]