Černová massacre: Difference between revisions
→Outline of the events: sources |
format |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The people of Černová knew nothing about this letter and kept on organizing in favor of Hlinka. They sent anonymous letters to the bishop (Párvy), the canon (Kurimsky), the dean (Pazúrik). In one letter, the wrote to Pazúrik: ''"we will welcome you with axes, clubs and stones. Even the smallest child will throw stones at you because you have Jewish nature, you keep with the [[Jew]]s, not with the Catholics…"''{{Fact|date=January 2008}} But the recipients did not take these letters seriously. |
The people of Černová knew nothing about this letter and kept on organizing in favor of Hlinka. They sent anonymous letters to the bishop (Párvy), the canon (Kurimsky), the dean (Pazúrik). In one letter, the wrote to Pazúrik: ''"we will welcome you with axes, clubs and stones. Even the smallest child will throw stones at you because you have Jewish nature, you keep with the [[Jew]]s, not with the Catholics…"''{{Fact|date=January 2008}} But the recipients did not take these letters seriously. |
||
[[Martin Pazúrik]] came to sanctify the church on 27 October in a [[coach (carriage)|coach]] with 15 gendarmes (all [[ethnic]] [[Slovak people|Slovak]]<ref>[http://www.szombat.org/ujhirek/1031_hlinkapolitika_egyszerfennegyszerlenn_atortenelemsulya.htm Hungarian Jewish magazine about the event]</ref>). When the coach entered the village, the crowd (some 400 local people) obstructed the path and started to scrum. The Hungarian<ref>http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm< |
[[Martin Pazúrik]] came to sanctify the church on 27 October in a [[coach (carriage)|coach]] with 15 gendarmes (all [[ethnic]] [[Slovak people|Slovak]]<ref>[http://www.szombat.org/ujhirek/1031_hlinkapolitika_egyszerfennegyszerlenn_atortenelemsulya.htm Hungarian Jewish magazine about the event]</ref>). When the coach entered the village, the crowd (some 400 local people) obstructed the path and started to scrum. The Hungarian<ref>http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm</ref> officer Pereszlenyi ordered the coach to advance and the demonstrators were whipped.<ref>http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra2.html</ref><ref>http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm</ref> After being attacked by the crowd throwing stones<ref>http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm Detailed description of the [[Černová tragedy]] by an eye witness</ref>, the gendarmes lost control and [[sergeant]] Ján Ladiczky gave the order to open fire. The gendarmes fired four times, killing 15 people, seriously injuring 12 and lightly injuring 40.<ref>http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra3.html (Slovak)</ref> |
||
Although police force fire was not uncommon that time in Austria-Hungary (regardless ethnicity) and elsewhere<ref>In 1907 in Romania, during the last European peasant uprising, the army massacred 11 thousand people; in 1904 the Russian army killed more than 1000 workers in [[Petrograd]], not mentioning the British colonial police in India.<ref |
Although police force fire was not uncommon that time in Austria-Hungary (regardless ethnicity) and elsewhere,<ref>In 1907 in Romania, during the last European peasant uprising, the army massacred 11 thousand people; in 1904 the Russian army killed more than 1000 workers in [[Petrograd]], not mentioning the British colonial police in India.</ref> the tragedy sparked protests in the [[Europe]]an press and it turned world's attention to the attitude to the minorities in Hungary. Important protesting European personalities included the Norwegian Nobel Prize holder [[Bjornstjerne Bjornson]] and the Oxford historian [[Robert William Seton-Watson]].<ref>http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm</ref> Hlinka's appeal against the 1906 verdict was rejected, thus, from 30 November 1907 till 27 February 1910 he was imprisoned in the Csillagbörtön (''Star Prison''), [[Szeged]]. Under an order of [[pope]] [[Pius X]], Párvy was forced to cancel Hlinka's suspension on 8 April [[1909]] and in [[1910]] he was finally allowed to consecrate the church in his native village. |
||
Today's nationalist Slovak politicians - especially the members of the [[Slovak National Party]] -, even though gendarmes were Slovaks, interpret the event as "Hungarian gendarmes shooting at innocent Slovaks" (during the legal actions after the massacre, some gendarmes refused to be witnesses, because the victims were their relatives).{{fact}} However, objective Slovak politicians and historians see the events as the manifestation of abuse of police power without any ethnic or nationalist intention.{{fact}} |
Today's nationalist Slovak politicians - especially the members of the [[Slovak National Party]] -, even though gendarmes were Slovaks, interpret the event as "Hungarian gendarmes shooting at innocent Slovaks" (during the legal actions after the massacre, some gendarmes refused to be witnesses, because the victims were their relatives).{{fact}} However, objective Slovak politicians and historians see the events as the manifestation of abuse of police power without any ethnic or nationalist intention.{{fact}} |
||
Revision as of 04:28, 19 May 2008
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2007) |
The Černová tragedy (or Černová massacre, Slovak: Černovská tragédia, Hungarian: Csernovai tragédia) was a bloody massacre that happened in Černová (then officially Csernova, now part of Ružomberok) on 27 October 1907.
Outline of the events
In Černová, the inhabitants decided to build a catholic church from their own and Slovak Americans' finances, and from the initiative of Andrej Hlinka, their own native priest. Construction started in April 1907 and by the autumn, the church was ready for consecration.[1] At that time, Hlinka was suspended by his bishop Sándor Párvy because he supported the Slovak candidate Vavro Šrobár in an electoral campaign.[2] Moreover, Hlinka was sentenced for two years in jail because his campaign speeches were considered incitement according to 172th § of the 1878 Penal Code[3]. However, the inhabitants requested that Hlinka should consecrate the church, otherwise they requested to delay the consecration. So the people of Černová requested the consecration of the church in a letter (worded by Hlinka). Párvy gave his consent to that. In a second letter (also worded by Hlinka) the people requested that Hlinka be present at the consecration and in a third one, that he himself consecrates the church. Párvy - according to the canon law - refused to cancel Hlinka' suspension. Instead, he appointed canon Anton Kurimsky, the former parish priest of Ružomberok.
Hlinka was getting prepared for a lecture tour in Moravia. Before he left, the people of Černová once again wrote a letter to bishop Párvy. He delayed the consecration with a few days, but appointed again Kurimsky. When Hlinka left, he told to the people: "If you want, consecrate the church, if not, well, not!". The people were not aware of the canon law and Hlinka took no effort to tell them that he has no right to consecrate the church. Instead of explaining this, he left his worshipers with the belief that they have the right to review the bishop's decision.[citation needed] The lack of information was one of the main factors leading to the tragedy.[citation needed]
Dean Pazúrik, Hlinka's superior upon getting know the new date asked for further delay so Hlinka can return to take part. The bishop agreed, but Hlinka wrote in his response (24 October): "I won't participate on the consecration on any conditions. […] Try to dissuade Kurimsky if you can and you yourself consecrate the church. I also don't want to be present because I don't want to be responsible for any possible events..."[citation needed] This letter makes clear that Hlinka was aware of the risk of "possible events" (though probably not a massacre), but he refused to return to calm down his people.
The people of Černová knew nothing about this letter and kept on organizing in favor of Hlinka. They sent anonymous letters to the bishop (Párvy), the canon (Kurimsky), the dean (Pazúrik). In one letter, the wrote to Pazúrik: "we will welcome you with axes, clubs and stones. Even the smallest child will throw stones at you because you have Jewish nature, you keep with the Jews, not with the Catholics…"[citation needed] But the recipients did not take these letters seriously.
Martin Pazúrik came to sanctify the church on 27 October in a coach with 15 gendarmes (all ethnic Slovak[4]). When the coach entered the village, the crowd (some 400 local people) obstructed the path and started to scrum. The Hungarian[5] officer Pereszlenyi ordered the coach to advance and the demonstrators were whipped.[6][7] After being attacked by the crowd throwing stones[8], the gendarmes lost control and sergeant Ján Ladiczky gave the order to open fire. The gendarmes fired four times, killing 15 people, seriously injuring 12 and lightly injuring 40.[9]
Although police force fire was not uncommon that time in Austria-Hungary (regardless ethnicity) and elsewhere,[10] the tragedy sparked protests in the European press and it turned world's attention to the attitude to the minorities in Hungary. Important protesting European personalities included the Norwegian Nobel Prize holder Bjornstjerne Bjornson and the Oxford historian Robert William Seton-Watson.[11] Hlinka's appeal against the 1906 verdict was rejected, thus, from 30 November 1907 till 27 February 1910 he was imprisoned in the Csillagbörtön (Star Prison), Szeged. Under an order of pope Pius X, Párvy was forced to cancel Hlinka's suspension on 8 April 1909 and in 1910 he was finally allowed to consecrate the church in his native village.
Today's nationalist Slovak politicians - especially the members of the Slovak National Party -, even though gendarmes were Slovaks, interpret the event as "Hungarian gendarmes shooting at innocent Slovaks" (during the legal actions after the massacre, some gendarmes refused to be witnesses, because the victims were their relatives).[citation needed] However, objective Slovak politicians and historians see the events as the manifestation of abuse of police power without any ethnic or nationalist intention.[citation needed]
References
- ^ http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra1.html (Slovak)
- ^ http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra1.html
- ^ 1000 év törvényei - 1878. évi V. törvénycikk a magyar büntetőtörvénykönyv a büntettekről és vétségekről (Act No. 5 (1878): on the Hungarian Penal Code for crimes and offences)
- ^ Hungarian Jewish magazine about the event
- ^ http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm
- ^ http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra2.html
- ^ http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm
- ^ http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm Detailed description of the Černová tragedy by an eye witness
- ^ http://www.cernova.sk/sublinks/cernovska_masakra3.html (Slovak)
- ^ In 1907 in Romania, during the last European peasant uprising, the army massacred 11 thousand people; in 1904 the Russian army killed more than 1000 workers in Petrograd, not mentioning the British colonial police in India.
- ^ http://www.petericepudding.com/hlinka3.htm