Jump to content

User talk:Poorman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Doc glasgow (talk | contribs)
Poorman (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Thank you for the comment on my [[User_talk:Peter Kirby|talk page]]. I formally recognize you as a [[human|human being]]! Just kidding. ^_^ Would you support me working on a merge of [[Authentic Matthew]] into [[Gospel of the Hebrews]], and redirecting the former to the latter? You may comment here, there, anywhere--but probably best to put it [[Talk:Authentic Matthew|here]]. --[[User:Peter Kirby|Peter Kirby]] 07:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the comment on my [[User_talk:Peter Kirby|talk page]]. I formally recognize you as a [[human|human being]]! Just kidding. ^_^ Would you support me working on a merge of [[Authentic Matthew]] into [[Gospel of the Hebrews]], and redirecting the former to the latter? You may comment here, there, anywhere--but probably best to put it [[Talk:Authentic Matthew|here]]. --[[User:Peter Kirby|Peter Kirby]] 07:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Go for it Peter--[[User:Poorman|Poorman]] 08:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


== please don't cut and paste ==
== please don't cut and paste ==

Revision as of 08:20, 23 August 2005

Thank you, thank you, Master Thief Garrett! You are the first person to recognize me as a human being. I will always be in your debt. --Poorman 08:41, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment on my talk page. I formally recognize you as a human being! Just kidding. ^_^ Would you support me working on a merge of Authentic Matthew into Gospel of the Hebrews, and redirecting the former to the latter? You may comment here, there, anywhere--but probably best to put it here. --Peter Kirby 07:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it Peter--Poorman 08:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

please don't cut and paste

Poorman, would you please refrain from 'cutting and pasting' text from elsewhere onto Authentic Matthew. Particularly when you do it with the user's sig included, it makes it look like that individual has contributed to the current debate. It also makes it difficult from anyone 'passing by' to understand what we are all currently talking about. If you want to refer to earlier discussions, which is a perfectly legitimate thing to do, then the usual thing to do is to insert a link to the diff. (e.g. please see the summing up of the precious VfD [1]}. If you could stick to this, I think it would help us all settle this matter. Thanks --Doc (?) 07:52, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's better. But if you are refering to any more than one sentence, a 'diff' link is still best. --Doc (?) 08:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]