User talk:Lomn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:11, 2 June 2008

Old talk topics headquartered at User talk:Lomn/Archive

Debunking definition

I have a Websters Dictionary and it states that "Debunk" is "to ridicule". 65.173.105.197 (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The primary entry for "debunk" in Webster's is "to expose the sham or falseness of". Not "ridicule". — Lomn 21:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks/Bans

How and when do these start? IF I did'nt ask, someone else could in a horrible manner and may get blocked (:O). What is the scale/criteria? 65.173.105.197 (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC) :)[reply]

Also, is there a article on these Emoticons as well? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.173.105.197 (talk) 23:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason I asked is that I have just got some really weird ones with a E-mail program. As for the sig, just me getting old. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 23:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC):O :D[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 How and when do these start? IF I did'nt ask, someone ''else'' could in a horrible manner and may get blocked (''':O'''). What is the scale/criteria? [[Special:Contributions/65.173.105.197|65.173.105.197]] ([[User talk:65.173.105.197|talk]]) 22:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC) ''':)'''
 ::Also, is there a article on these Emoticons as well? ''':)'''  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.173.105.197|65.173.105.197]] ([[User talk:65.173.105.197|talk]]) 23:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:::Reason I asked is that I have just got some really weird ones with a E-mail program. As for the sig, just me getting old. [[Special:Contributions/65.173.105.197|65.173.105.197]] ([[User talk:65.173.105.197|talk]]) 23:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)''':O''' ''':D'''