Talk:Drunken Master II: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Time's all time 100 |
→Plot?: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Go ahead and add it in the Critical Reception section, if you feel it's relevant. I would note that it was compiled in 2005. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123|talk]]) 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
* Go ahead and add it in the Critical Reception section, if you feel it's relevant. I would note that it was compiled in 2005. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123|talk]]) 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Plot? == |
|||
Who wrote the plot contained in this article? It barely touches on the plot of the film and completely omits the character names/actors contained within. |
|||
Also there is very little, if anything, regarding the fallout between Lau Kar Leung and Jackie Chan, which at the time added a lot of media interest in the film and probably didn't hurt the box office takings in Asia. |
Revision as of 16:01, 4 June 2008
Film: Chinese Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
I think this film making it to Time's All-Time 100 Movies list(http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/the_complete_list.html) is worth mentioning.(Bairuz (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC))
- Go ahead and add it in the Critical Reception section, if you feel it's relevant. I would note that it was compiled in 2005. Gram123 (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Plot?
Who wrote the plot contained in this article? It barely touches on the plot of the film and completely omits the character names/actors contained within.
Also there is very little, if anything, regarding the fallout between Lau Kar Leung and Jackie Chan, which at the time added a lot of media interest in the film and probably didn't hurt the box office takings in Asia.