User talk:The undertow: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Raul654 (talk | contribs)
Blocked
Line 6: Line 6:
==Blocked==
==Blocked==
I have blocked you, per discussion on the arbitration committee's mailing list. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 15:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked you, per discussion on the arbitration committee's mailing list. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 15:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
:Big shocker. The same guy who brought me to AC because he is the leader of the ID crew. I'm outraged. Or not. Your block is not only a COI, but on a personal note, you are just waiting with baited breathe to get rid of me. So why was I blocked? The article I created was and has satisfied all notability issues. What is the reason for my block. Is this sanctioned by AC or a unilateral decision? [[User:The_undertow|<font style="color:#820900">''the_undertow''</font>]] [[User_talk:The_undertow|<font style="color:#820900"><small><sup>talk</sup></small></font>]] 15:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:26, 16 June 2008

Your latest article has been speedied

Man, I came back from trying to sleep, and I saw the article you created. It's been speedied for self-referential and notability reasons. Please don't recreate it, Wikipedia's not for settling grudges like that, ok? (Once you've read this, let me know and I'll blank it). SirFozzie (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see the evidence that the creation of the article was in some way based on a grudge. As I seen it, it was very carefully worded with NPOV in mind. — MaggotSyn 13:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There was nothing in the article that was meant to position myself nor steer others against a certain belief. We are all here to give free information for those who cannot or do not have access to it - and the article I wrote contained zero original research, and was quite well-sourced. One cannot, and should not delve into the motives of editors, but look at the articles themselves, and deem them worthy of inclusion. WP:N would deem that this article, like all I have written, follow that well-adhered to doctrine. the_undertow talk 14:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you, per discussion on the arbitration committee's mailing list. Raul654 (talk) 15:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big shocker. The same guy who brought me to AC because he is the leader of the ID crew. I'm outraged. Or not. Your block is not only a COI, but on a personal note, you are just waiting with baited breathe to get rid of me. So why was I blocked? The article I created was and has satisfied all notability issues. What is the reason for my block. Is this sanctioned by AC or a unilateral decision? the_undertow talk 15:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]