Eschatological verification: Difference between revisions
in-text cites needed |
→Alegory of the Celestial City: spelling |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The term, most commonly used in relation to God and the afterlife, that explains how something can be verifiable if true but not falsifiable if false. |
The term, most commonly used in relation to God and the afterlife, that explains how something can be verifiable if true but not falsifiable if false. |
||
== |
==Allegory of the Celestial City== |
||
This premise is best explained by John Hick’s allegory of the quest to the Celestial City. In this parable, a theist and an atheist are both walking down the same road. The theist believes there is a destination, the atheist believes there is not. If they reach the destination, the theist will have been proven right, however if there is no destination on an endless road, this can never be verified. This is an attempt to explain how a theist expects some form of life or existence after death and an atheist does not. They both have separate belief systems and live life accordingly, but logically one is right and the other is not. If the theist is right, he will be proven so when he arrives in the afterlife. However |
This premise is best explained by John Hick’s allegory of the quest to the Celestial City. In this parable, a theist and an atheist are both walking down the same road. The theist believes there is a destination, the atheist believes there is not. If they reach the destination, the theist will have been proven right, however if there is no destination on an endless road, this can never be verified. This is an attempt to explain how a theist expects some form of life or existence after death and an atheist does not. They both have separate belief systems and live life accordingly, but logically one is right and the other is not. If the theist is right, he will be proven so when he arrives in the afterlife. However, if the atheist is right, they will simply both be dead and nothing will be verified. |
||
==Sources== |
==Sources== |
||
Revision as of 14:28, 25 June 2008
 | This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. |
The term, most commonly used in relation to God and the afterlife, that explains how something can be verifiable if true but not falsifiable if false.
Allegory of the Celestial City
This premise is best explained by John Hick’s allegory of the quest to the Celestial City. In this parable, a theist and an atheist are both walking down the same road. The theist believes there is a destination, the atheist believes there is not. If they reach the destination, the theist will have been proven right, however if there is no destination on an endless road, this can never be verified. This is an attempt to explain how a theist expects some form of life or existence after death and an atheist does not. They both have separate belief systems and live life accordingly, but logically one is right and the other is not. If the theist is right, he will be proven so when he arrives in the afterlife. However, if the atheist is right, they will simply both be dead and nothing will be verified.
Sources
Alston, William P. “Functionalism and Theological Language.” In Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989a.
Hick, John H. Faith and Knowledge. 2nd ed. London, UK: Macmillan, 1988. 177-178.
Hick, John H. Philosophy or Religion. 4th ed. London, UK: Prentice Hall, 1990. 82-99, 135-136.
"The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". 2006. University of Tennessee, Martin. 21 June 2008 http://www.iep.utm.edu.