Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Lewis (radio host): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
relisting |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
||
:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 23:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 23:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*'''Keep''': a lack of sources doesn't mean non-notable, it means lazy editors. As for the nominator, there are a multitude of other sources of information on earth besides Google News, it isn't a very good test of notability, and certainly not a test that should be used when determining whether or not to AFD an article. Pull your head out of your ass. [[Special:Contributions/208.82.225.232|208.82.225.232]] ([[User talk:208.82.225.232|talk]]) 08:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:21, 2 July 2008
- Jason Lewis (radio host) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article lacks 3rd party sources supporting the notability of this radio personality. No mention of any awards, no mention of syndication of the radio show. Google news search brings up a number of articles, but they are all local. Is this person notable? Rtphokie (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Do whatever you want, I don't care. I think he is notable, but it's Wikipedia, what does it matter? I've got better things to do than to go find some references to make the article passable. ----PSzalapski (talk) 10:02, June 27, 2008
- Weak Keep IF his role as Limbaugh's most often-used fill-in can be sourced, I can live with that establishing notability, given the amount of affiliates that carry the show. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 07:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: a lack of sources doesn't mean non-notable, it means lazy editors. As for the nominator, there are a multitude of other sources of information on earth besides Google News, it isn't a very good test of notability, and certainly not a test that should be used when determining whether or not to AFD an article. Pull your head out of your ass. 208.82.225.232 (talk) 08:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)