User talk:Xeno666: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The capability of a person's MP3 player has nothing to do with their income, merely the player they choose to buy. Some people may use MP3 players instead of listening to radio, but that is no reason to refer to someone who uses an MP3 Player as a "Radio listener". |
The capability of a person's MP3 player has nothing to do with their income, merely the player they choose to buy. Some people may use MP3 players instead of listening to radio, but that is no reason to refer to someone who uses an MP3 Player as a "Radio listener". |
||
A true [[hardware random number generator]] uses a physical process (such as [[nuclear |
A true [[hardware random number generator]] uses a physical process (such as [[nuclear decay]]). The idea that a music player (even an expensive one) has a true hardware random number generator is absurd when a [[Pseudorandom number generator]] can be suitable for the task. [[User:Xeno666|Pug50]] ([[User talk:Xeno666#top|talk]]) 22:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:35, 3 July 2008
==AfD nomination of United Kingdom Colonial Marines==
An article that you have been involved in editing, United Kingdom Colonial Marines, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom Colonial Marines. Thank you. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Your edit on Shuffle play
I am under the impression that MP3 players are potential replacements to music radio. I mean, shuffle play alone is a simple feature that inspired my projected estimate of a loss of popularity for music radio, so I thought it would be appropriate to say that lower end models of MP3 player fail to discourage people from listening to radio due to their lack of support for randomization, or that randomization is not a factory default feature.
Anyway, I personally switched to MP3 players as the primary means to listen to random music since radio has had setbacks that warranted that kind of change.
So, what is you reason for removing that statement from the article. --Roadstaa (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
The capability of a person's MP3 player has nothing to do with their income, merely the player they choose to buy. Some people may use MP3 players instead of listening to radio, but that is no reason to refer to someone who uses an MP3 Player as a "Radio listener".
A true hardware random number generator uses a physical process (such as nuclear decay). The idea that a music player (even an expensive one) has a true hardware random number generator is absurd when a Pseudorandom number generator can be suitable for the task. Pug50 (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)