Jump to content

User talk:Barneca/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Why didn't you answer me when I speak with you ! I told you unblock Eremia 7 times , without using an another account abusively ! I have created
{{atnhead}}
myself a lat account ( I hope this ! ) , by your fault ! I have waited ! And this is ENOUGH ! Must I blank you talk page for to have an answer !

Pleease , if you unblock Eremia , I will use only this account , I do not use a anoer account abusively ¡ You can give me a chaznce ! This is not a last try !
== User welcome ==
[[User:Alexandra Georgiana Eremia|Alexandra Gerogiana Eremia]]

I think that your welcome message to [[User talk:Billsouse]] is quite probably the nicest I have seen. Good job. - [[User:Eldereft|Eldereft]] ~([[Special:Contributions/Eldereft|s]])[[User talk:Eldereft|talk]]~ 06:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:Hey, thanks Eldereft. Always nice to start Monday morning with a compliment. I have that welcome template at [[user:barneca/temps/uw-test1ip]] and [[user:barneca/temps/uw-test1ac]]. Feel free to steal them if you'd like (you'll have to play with them a little, as I hard coded my signature and a timestamp into them). --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 10:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
::Hi Barneca. Having seen those templates I think I might steal them too. A lot of the already-available ones don't allow for enough possibilities about what the target was doing, in my opinion. Good work! [[User:Olaf Davis|Olaf Davis]] | [[User talk:Olaf Davis|Talk]] 10:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&curid=5149102&diff=210350328&oldid=210349416 Thanks] ==

I've never archived a noticeboard discussion before. In this case, I felt compelled to do it because the originator requested an archival. '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup>message</sup></b>]]'' 16:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:The problem is, different places (Afd, SPP, ANI) archive things differently, and inconsistenly. I only know this because I did it wrong before and got yelled at, so now I try to fix it when I see it. to be clear, I have no problems with the actual decision to archive. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 16:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:NotTheWikipediaWeekly/Security Tips ==

I assume Graham redirected it because it ''was'' linked, but I adjusted all links to point to [[Wikipedia:NotTheWikipediaWeekly/Helpful Hints#Security tips]], so [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:NotTheWikipediaWeekly/Security_Tips|the redirect is obsolete]]. [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Dorftrottel|criticise]]) 15:28,&nbsp;[[May 6]],&nbsp;200<!--DT-->8
:If I interpreted his restore comment right, he was keeping it so as not to lose the contribution history. If the page is still there in a few hours, I'll ask him if he still feels that way; I need to run right now. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 15:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
::Graham does, indeed, still disagree with the deletion (see his talk page if you're curious). I don't have strong feelings either way, but I'm not going to delete it as uncontested housekeeping if he still feels that way. If you really want to, you can discuss further with him, or I guess MfD it, or something. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 04:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Ok, thanks for clarifying, and also for notifying me. [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Dorftrottel|talk]]) 04:08,&nbsp;[[May 7]],&nbsp;200<!--DT-->8

== An old pal wearing a wooly handcovering ==

Since you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Bongo]], thought you might want to take a look at this wooly fellow [[User:Chopped Lamb]] whose [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/JRS-SEC|edits and language are hauntingly familiar]]. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 18:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
:Contributed at the [[WP:SSP]] case; chickening out, calling myself "involved", and not blocking myself. Also, following the new account's edit history lead me to [[User:Jglogau‎]], who appears to be the anti-JRS-SEC; he started a ''spam'' version of [[Rob Bongo]] last year, and among other things, seems to have article creation problems himself. If those two ever met, there would be some kind of matter/anti-matter reaction. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 19:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
::Also, can't help but note this edit summary: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jglogau&diff=prev&oldid=206985913]. Oh noes! NPOV-pushing! :) --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 19:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

== Doppelganger ==

Quite simple. I deleted the first version of the "Userpage" today and at the time did a check for the contributions and deleted contributions to see what else was afoot. There was only one deleted contribution which was the cause of the block. Since I assumed that the current incident would attract more eyes on the matter I asked for that particular edit to be oversighted as it would have put someone at risk. I only mentioned it to prove without doubt that there is no connection between the two. Something that the current logs and records no longer can show. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] ([[User talk:Agathoclea|talk]]) 22:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

== RfA Issues ==

Crap, apologies. (Somewhat sad that I manage to create a BLP issue by trying to avoid one). Would a [[WP:RFO|RFO]] mess with anything on RfA? --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 03:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:And would an RFO be overkill here? (It'd be more than one, since there are issues on the RfA page and subpage). --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 03:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
::I'll put in for the RFO. --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 03:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Done, RfO in. --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 03:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== ack! ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Dell970&curid=17316098&diff=210958033&oldid=210957667 Now what?][[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 03:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:I just raised it at [[WT:RFA]]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 03:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== Wikipedia for Schools online ==

Hi, I saw your query at AN about an online version of Wikipedia for Schools, I have replied there but it's a busy thread, so in case you missed it, the link is [http://schools-wikipedia.org/]. Best wishes, [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 09:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, Duncan. I got wrapped up in something else and completely forgot about that thread. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 10:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== RfA talk discussion ==

The reason that you "bother" is because it was probably quite prudent to inform the RfA community of the events surrounding the snow close of Dell's RfA. I thought it was very good that you started that thread to let people discuss to the extent that it was. I requested that it be marked "resolved" because of 2 reasons: 1, it seemed to be agreed that a SNOW close was accurate regardless of the circumstances and 2: Dell was engaging just about everyone in a harassing way (he was subsequently blocked). Anyways, just posting here to let you know I thought the thread was worthwhile. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 18:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, Gwyand. Just disappointing to see someone who I tried to go out of my way to help, react like that. I guess looking gullible isn't the end of the world. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
::Yeah, her actions were dissapointing, but hindsight is 20/20. If it was just a typical inexperienced editor, your thread may have gone a long way in encouraging them to properly prepare for their next RfA. Also, talking about hindsight, seeing Dell's use of the word "colored" on her talk page makes me think that original opposes over racist edits were valid. Oh well. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 18:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Hi Barneca. Nope, haven't heard anything, oddly enough. And I concur with you: I wish I had invested my time in a more worthwhile cause. --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 18:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== The Barnstar of Diligence ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar_of_Diligence.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In recognition of your diligence, attention to detail, and exemplary upholding of Wikipedia values in the [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dell970]] affair. [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 19:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
|}
:Aw, thanks Mike. I needed that. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 19:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
::You are welcome, and thank you. I'm glad that helped. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 19:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

== This ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Barneca&curid=8893412&diff=211299916&oldid=209263034 diff] made me laugh out loud, Barn. Out Loud. Anywho...back to my watchlist. control+F5....[[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]] | [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]] | [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 19:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
:I managed to go almost 2 hours that time. I must have it beat. Whew, good to have that monkey off my back, that was easier than i thought it would be. Now just a quick check of my watchlist, and I'll log off again. Ctrl-F5. Ctrl-F5. Ctrl-F5. Ctrl-F5.... --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] [[User talk:Barneca|(talk)]] <small>(see note @ top of my talk if I don't reply)</small> 21:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[User talk:Nicoleta Sofronie]] ==

Good job on this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANicoleta_Sofronie&diff=211342211&oldid=211255332] --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk</font>]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/NeilN|<font color="#CD0000">contribs</font>]]''</font></sup> 21:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you, we'll see if it takes. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] [[User talk:Barneca|(talk)]] <small>(see note @ top of my talk if I don't reply)</small> 21:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

== Formatting at AN/I ==

I noticed you edited my post to 'remove transclusions'. Is using those templates not acceptable? I think it more convenient to give a direct link to a user's talk and contribs. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] ([[User talk:The way, the truth, and the light|talk]]) 18:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

:Actually, I usually don't edit other people's stuff, and probably should have dropped you a note about it. Sorry. I got rid of the transclusions because that puts a copy of whatever was on their user page on the ANI page; someone put a sockpuppet notice on one of the user pages, and transcluding that on ANI, put the ANI page into the category of suspected sock puppets, and copied the big notice onto ANI as well.

:You did: <nowiki>{{user:JohnSmith}}</nowiki>
:I did: <nowiki>[[user:JohnSmith]]</nowiki>
:What you probably wanted to do was: <nowiki>{{user|JohnSmith}}</nowiki>

:I'm not sure I explained that well, so let me know if it isn't unclear. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 23:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

::OK, so there's nothing wrong with the template. I see what I did, thanks. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] ([[User talk:The way, the truth, and the light|talk]]) 00:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

== Multiple accounts (regarding card games) ==

Thanks for you stepping about recent edits to the [[Card game]] article, and attempting some constructive engagement with this editor (i.e. [[User:Nastasija Marachkovskaja]], [[User:Oana Ban]], [[User:Eremia]], and others such as [[User:Dakota Blue Richards]] (I think)) . I've tried to do some of that too. I was wondering if it's appropriate to start a list of sock puppets to keep track of the accounts that have been created and keep a record of the activity. I don't know which one might be considered the "master" but I think the Dakota Blue Richards account was the first one create. I'm not trying to get this person "in trouble", but thought that having some more formal record of what's going on might be warranted. Of course I'm not an admin, so what do I know? :) [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 20:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
:I have a list at [[User:Barneca/watch/bvr]]. That way, I can use "Related changes" to see, at a glance, if any of the user pages or articles I have listed there have been vandalized. You're welcome to add information to that page if you think it will help, and of course help keep an eye on those pages if you want.
:If they keep up the disruption, I plan to ask a Checkuser to see if we could do a rangeblock hardblock without cutting too many legitimate users out. From a message they left on one of their accounts, this could (if they are telling the truth) be a kid in France, so a rangeblock might not be that much of an inconvenience to legitimate editors. Or, better yet, they'll stop disrupting and be constructive (although I don't see much chance of their desire to see game changed to sport getting much support in any content resolution). --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 23:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks, I've added that page to my watchlist (so that I can find it easily), and if I encounter appropriate incidents I'll add them there. Thanks again for your participation here. [[User:Craw-daddy|--Craw-daddy]] | [[User talk:Craw-daddy|T]] | 23:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Sure thing, hope it eases up. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

== range protection ==
I noticed your comment favoring something I have been thinking about: range protection. Semi-protection is an ugly answer ... unless we decide to block anonymous editing completely, it just doesn't really fit with anything, and general blocking doesn't work once it gets much bigger than a /16. What I would like is to be able to protect an article with a group of CIDR ranges, and have that block be effective against IPs within that range and '''registered editors within that range whose account was created after the block was put in place.''' That last bit would have to be capable of being overriden by an admin (basically a "subject to IP restriction" flag on the account). Has there been any discussion of this in the past that you could point me at?[[User:Kww|Kww]] ([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 12:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
:Not really. The first part (ignoring the account creation bit) I brought up once at [[WP:VPT]], I really can't remember when. I'd try to find a link, but it isn't really worth it; if memory serves, one person commented that they didn't think you could do that, and one didn't understand why it would be useful: basically, a kinder version of "just semiprotect the article, you dope". No one else commented in the 7 days the thread was alive. It's possible someone has brought this up before, to be honest I didn't look.
:As to your second bit, that hadn't occured to me, and I suspect that (a) it would make it a ''much'' more useful option, and (b) would be a ''lot'' harder to achieve. In a perfect world, it would work that way. But I'd settle for range protection without it, as better than nothing and better than now, if the account creation part wasn't feasible.
:Things like this seem, to me, to be Catch-22's. If you bring it up, usually people say "file a Bugzilla request". But I don't think Bugzilla requests are acted on unless you can demonstrate a widespread agreeement that it would be useful. I'd certainly support the idea if you bring it up again. Not sure where the best place to have the discussion is. Maybe [[WP:VPT]] again, but this time push it a little if no one comments? --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 12:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
::Here's the link: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29/Archive_1#Technical_feasibility_of_an_IP_block.2Frange_block_for_a_specific_article]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 13:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Feel free to chime in '''''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#An_alternative_to_IP-range_blocking_and_semi-protection:_IP-range_protection here]'''''.[[User:Kww|Kww]] ([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 16:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

==Back and could use your help==

[[User:Barneca|barneca]] Greetings my friend. I am back, after a long period of illness, family illness, and assorted real world issues. I am going to post an article this week, and would be very grateful if I could solicit your help with any formatting problems. (As you know, I am a lot better on writing than I am on formatting!) I will understand if you cannot, between real world demands and the vastly increased demands on you after your election. (Congratulations, by the way, a better and fairer admin has not been elected!) [[User:JohninMaryland|JohninMaryland]] ([[User talk:JohninMaryland|talk]]) 19:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
:Hi John,
:Glad you're back. As long as there is no real rush, I'd be happy to take a look when you post it. Assuming I can scrounge the willpower, I'm trying to be on-wiki a lot less this month, but I'll still have time for stuff like this. Just let me know. And, thanks for the kind words. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 21:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

:::[[User:Barneca|barneca]] Hi again my friend. NO rush. I will let you know when I post - it was one I was working on before the sky fell in, and I should finish this week. I just want to make sure I don't inadvertantly link to the wrong site, or any of the other rather odd things I have managed in the past! THANKS, and again, congrats, you earned the mop, and it is good to see good things happen for good people...[[User:JohninMaryland|JohninMaryland]] ([[User talk:JohninMaryland|talk]]) 00:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

== Just to say hai ==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Smiley.svg|left|62px]]

[[User:Tinucherian|Tinucherian]] has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
</div>
Have a nice day ! -- <small> <span style="border:1px solid #6699FF;padding:1px;background:#6699FF">[[User:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian </em>''']] <sup> [[User talk:Tinucherian| (Wanna Talk?) ]] </sup> </span> </small> - 09:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, you too! --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

== Eremia ! ==

I need only 3 three accounts , [[User:Eremia|Eremia]] , [[User:Alexandre Eremia|Alexandra Eremia]] , and [[User Parslow|Parslow]] ! I finish vandalism , I will TRY for discussions , and If Parslow don't exists , I will create it ! Thanks ! It was valable only for all the wikis , excepted , in French wiki ! But I am not perfect ! I can have 3 accounts ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 17:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I have already responded on your talk page. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 17:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

== Rfb participation thanks ==

Hello, Barneca.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After [[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Avraham 2/Bureaucrat discussion|bureaucratic discussion]], the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. I wanted to especially thank you for taking part in the post discussion crat chat. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 17:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

==Brittney Skye==
Drat, you beat me to it. I saw the edit on recent history and it just looked a little odd. Then I see that it's a porn star, now being listed as a ''dead'' porn star. By the time I'd figred that out and double checked for a pulse you had beaten me to it. At least now I can say that I've gone to an adult website for research reasons. o_O --[[User:Human.v2.0|Human.v2.0]] ([[User talk:Human.v2.0|talk]]) 00:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:I noticed several edits to the article scroll by on recent changes; looked, and figured a porn star would have had fans that would have noticed she'd been dead for a year. And yeah, if anyone asks, it was "official business". --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== Centrifugal Force ==

Barneca, I don't think that you ever understood what the issue is about at centrifugal force. Anome has been consistently misrepresenting the situation and claiming that it is about a fringe viewpoint.

It is not. There are two aspects to centrifugal force. There is the centrifugal force associated with actual rotation. There is also an artificat associated with viewing a stationary situation from a rotating frame of reference.

Any attempts to mention the cause and effect aspects associated with actual rotation are being suppressed. The group controlling the article have wanted to focus on the artifact aspect as being the general situation.

Anome never knew what the argument was about. He set about to appease the majority. He has now turned vindictive because his attempts to deceive have not been running as smoothly as he would have liked.

His recent block was totally wrong because the edit in question broke no rules and wasn't even part of the controversy.

You are totally wrong to endorse Anome's block. [[Special:Contributions/118.175.84.92|118.175.84.92]] ([[User talk:118.175.84.92|talk]]) 18:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
:Do not use your IP address to evade your block. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Barneca, was that a way of saying that you don't really want to look at the truth of the situation?[[Special:Contributions/119.42.64.217|119.42.64.217]] ([[User talk:119.42.64.217|talk]]) 03:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:No, it was a way of saying '''Do not use your IP address to evade your block'''. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 03:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Barneca, the block was unlawful. It doesn't matter how many administrators sided with Anome. The block was unlawful. And now you are trying to disrupt discussions on the talk pages by deleting stuff on the talk pages. That is clearly against the rules. When somebody asks a question, they should have the common courtesy to listen to the answer without having somebody else going in and deleting the answer.

When you do an unlawful block, you lose all respect for the system. [[Special:Contributions/118.173.15.142|118.173.15.142]] ([[User talk:118.173.15.142|talk]]) 08:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

== GA ==
Yeah, GA was fun... [[User:Rracecarr|Rracecarr]] ([[User talk:Rracecarr|talk]]) 22:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== Block of Societyfinalclubs ==

Looking at the talk page, it appears that more than one of us was working on the AIV report for {{user|Societyfinalclubs}}. As I generally follow a 1RR for admins, I wanted to drop you a note explaining my research and subsequent actions. Based on the 3RR warning for [[Talk:Sacred Order of Skull and Crescent]] that was issued to this editor at 19:21 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASocietyfinalclubs&diff=212241042&oldid=212240910] and their continued blanking of the page at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASacred_Order_of_Skull_and_Crescent&diff=212243787&oldid=212241911 19:36] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sacred_Order_of_Skull_and_Crescent&diff=next&oldid=212244231 20:25], I blocked the editor for 12 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or issues. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:No, I understand, and was very tempted to do the same myself, until thinking of my alternate solution that I put on the talk page. But, we edit conflicted. The question now is whether to speedy the article, or leave it for them to return to when the block expires. Do you have a problem if I userfy it? Based on last year's AfD, and the complete absence of any non-Wikipedia Google hits, I have a strong hunch this is a hoax. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::I have no objections. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:::While I am willing to defer to your extension of good faith and not object to an early unblock, the editor's most recent messages do not reassure me that they understand either the importance or the ramifications of the three-revert rule. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 02:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I know, it's starting to look like windmill tilting on Prashanth's part, and mine too. Plus, I'm not even 100% convinced this isn't a hoax, I'm only userfying because I can't prove it, and if it isn't a hoax, deleting it as one would be poor form. I'm going to wait to see how they respond to my newer suggestion, but per your comment above, I may lift it early if it seems they're going to try to edit quietly. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 02:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::::: No offense I hope with the earlier disagreements. [[WP:AGF|All in good faith]]. Cheers. [[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 02:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::Oh, none at all, being unjaded enough to AGF is always a good character trait. If you haven't seen it already, they have returned as [[User:65.150.33.24]] to request a speedy, which I've done. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 03:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::Noted and thanks. Off for the day![[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 03:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::::Yeah, me too. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 03:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::::Your research looks quite good to me. I pride myself on being an even tempered, easy-going admin (while other admins go for the 24- or 31-hour block, if I think the project will be adequately protected, I will generally give a first-time offender just a 12-hour block), however my patience for and tolerance of this editor's obvious shenanigans is getting pretty thin. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 16:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me, I'm not societfinalclubs, I have a history of contrubutions to the Theta Nu Epsilon talk page-which you can check for yourself.[[User:Jonesbig|Jonesbig]] ([[User talk:Jonesbig|talk]]) 05:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:That doesn't mean you aren't the same person. I'm quite confident you are. Now write your stupid article, and leave me alone. I spent an hour trying to help you tonight, and this is the thanks I get. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 05:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Why do you keep saying we are the same person?[[User:Jonesbig|Jonesbig]] ([[User talk:Jonesbig|talk]]) 05:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:Because I'm not an idiot. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 05:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:: Just seeing the sockpuppetry evidence presented by you! Impressive work. I am perhaps partly to blame for my earlier defense of the user! I am very disappointed by his later behavior which I followed. Dont want to blame my poor judgement cos that will be going too far, but hmpf...I was really thinking they were a good editor, save for that small issue of 3RR. <nowiki>:(</nowiki> [[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 18:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Not sure if saw [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Societyfinalclubs]] yet, but it appears that someone beat you to the punch ... --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 18:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:Yep, I must say I was quite confused when I tried to create the Checkuser page; For a second, I couldn't figure out HOW ON EARTH the software knew to populate it with usernames from the SSP! (cut me some slack, I'm very sleepy). --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::Do you think {{user|Cornell1890}} is another lost sock ... ? --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 18:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
:::My gut instinct says yes, but I haven't had a chance to assemble any evidence, and I'm really hoping the Checkuser comes thru and identifies all of them. I purposely left out any accounts I wasn't very, very sure of. Looking at the history of that article, I think a majority of the redlinked usernames may be related. The AFD's and ANI report from last year seem to show a very determined hoaxer, I wouldn't be surprised if it was going on a long time. I'm also concerned about other possible hoaxes created by this person. But at least one or two of the articles created by SFC seem to have legit references, so it isn't all 100% hoax. complicated. Ick. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Now that I've had a chance to review '''all''' their contributions, I take that back; Mctrain/Societyfinalclubs had several [[Tell (poker)|tells]], and Cornell1890 shows none of them. The Checkuser doesn't list him, and there's no reason to think Mctrain was running some Checkuser-susceptible, and other Checuser-immune, puppets. Mctrain had socks that were all arguing with each other, so it made me suspicious of people who'd done nothing wrong; I'm glad I followed my instinct in the SSP report not to include people I wasn't sure about!
::::I don't think you have publicly accused him of that anywhere, but if you did, you might want to retract it. Societyfinalclubs sent him a condolence note, so I might have missed where Cornell was lumped in with them, or it might have been Mctrain yanking our chain some more. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::Thanks for the follow-up! My above query was much like your gut instinct: an early feeling formed before either of us had time to fully investigate the issue. Since your talk page is the only one I wondered out loud about it, my guess is that Mctrain was just stirring up the pot in an attempt to cover up his own trail of deception. I wish there were an easier way to deal with sock issues like this ... one wonders how much time we wasted on this. Regardless, kudos to you sir for your hard work! --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 14:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
::::::Agreed, and kudos to you as well. Wonder how long until he comes back? --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::::The number of newly registered editors at {{la|Collegiate secret societies in North America}} is enough to make my head spin. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

== Not for fun ==
'''I am not inserting my name for fun.''' This is a serious matter.

Why are people making it so hard to write for Wikipedia. I am on the verge of quitting even before writing my first article.

Without even looking, I see 2 users abusing the name of doctor. This is why I seek some sort of verification before I write. OK, people say that an IP is not proof. But my IP is so specific that any checkuser can say that I am likely to be a doctor or am writing from a medical office and not a prison, drug company, school, etc. [[User:Doctor Wikipedian|Doctor Wikipedian]] ([[User talk:Doctor Wikipedian|talk]]) 19:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

::It is incredibly easy to edit Wikipedia. Just start editing Wikipedia. Worry about your Wikipedigree, not your medical pedigree. [[User:joshschr|<span style="color: #002BB8;">joshschr</span>]] ([[User_talk:joshschr|<span style="color: #002BB8;">Talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/joshschr|<span style="color: #002BB8;">contribs</span>]]) 19:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

== [[Eremia]] ! ==
Finally , I need 2 accounts , but only 2 !
[[User:Eremia|Eremia]] and [[User:Alexandra Eremia|Alexandra Eremia]] !
I can use the both !
I have [[Eremia]] but , can you unblock [[Alexandra Eremia]] , just ONE !
With 1 , this is so diffcult !
With 2 , this is more easy !
[[User:Eremia|Eremia]] ([[User talk:Eremia|talk]]) 22:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[[User:Roger Parslow|Roger Parslow]]

=== Eremia - Edit 174 ! ===

Yes , [[Aliena Kvacha]] is blocked indefinit'ly !
Yes , [[Roger Parslow]] is blocked indefinit'ly !
Yes , [[Nastasija Marachkovaskaja]] is blocked indefinit'ly !
Yes , [[Dakota Blue Richards]] is blocked indefinit'ly ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Eremia|Eremia]] ([[User talk:Eremia|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eremia|contribs]]) 23:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

=== i would like to have 2 accounts ! ===

becase i love having 2 or 3 accounts , and i like the name " eremia " , and " alexandra eremia " , and " alexandra " !
if i loose a account , i have the another !
with 1 , i write on a subject , with the second , i create some page !
and i would like include card games in the sports , and i d'like to put the article and the categori in category " sports " ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Eremia|Eremia]] ([[User talk:Eremia|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eremia|contribs]]) 15:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Replying on your talk page. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 17:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


== Concerns ==

You have blocked Mctrain which is a legitimate account with the Chicago Public Library. I believe that there may be cross-over between legitimate users and non-legigimate users, or possibly, non-legitimates signing in on legitimate accounts. FYI the IP's you narrowed are shared accounts with the Chicago Public Library. I have posted to tell all Wikipedia users to create accounts on their own personal computers. Mctrain's focus is European history and architecture, not collegiate subject matter. Will you also please post this message on the Barbaro family page so there is no confusion with legitimacy. Thank you very much[[User:Geniejargon|Geniejargon]] ([[User talk:Geniejargon|talk]]) 18:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
:Mctrain, please see the message I left you at [[User talk:Geniejargon]]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 20:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
::This is turing into top shelf [[Comedy Gold]]! --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 22:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
:::It's a laugh a minute. Until you have to sort thru all the crap to see how much damage they've done in the last year: [[User:Barneca/watch/societyfinalclubs]] / [[User:Barneca/Sandboxen/Page1]]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 22:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Hi, Barneca. These guys (or this guy)—i.e., the [[User:Tiki-two|Tiki-two]]/[[User:Thost|Thost]]/[[User:F550|F550]]/[[User:Save venice|Save venice]]/[[User:Mctrain|Mctrain]] complex—have made me (and other users) waste a good deal of time dealing with their activities since I first became aware of them through my participation in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pugilist Club]]. In the next couple of weeks, I hope to begin undoing some of the fantasy they've inserted in [[Barbaro family]] and related articles. For now, I'd just like to thank you for getting a handle on the situation and making everyone else's life a little easier. (By the way, their signature move is attempting to blank any mention of their activities, or other users' concerns about the information their previous incarnations have added to articles, on article talk pages.) [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 00:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::Replied via email. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Barneca|Barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barneca|contribs]]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

== What should I use then? ==

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adam1213/warn <-- thats what i have been using

What should I use to warn? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Personalinformation|Personalinformation]] ([[User talk:Personalinformation|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Personalinformation|contribs]]) 01:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Give me a minute to look into that; it seems to be acting up. I'll reply on your talk page in a little while. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

== Praise for Patience ==

I would like to praise you for the patience you have shown in handling the user Eremia and all the related sockpuppets. Your efforts may seem futile to you in hindsight, but I would like you to know that there are users around who notice and appreciate the kind of effort you have expended in trying to help and handle users like that. [[User:HermanHiddema|HermanHiddema]] ([[User talk:HermanHiddema|talk]]) 13:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
:Replied on your talk. Short version: Thanks! --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
::You're welcome. Thank you for the cookie! :-) [[User:HermanHiddema|HermanHiddema]] ([[User talk:HermanHiddema|talk]]) 14:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

== Thanks for the block ==

I would like to thank you for blocking [[User:Whitemistert]]. As one who is endlessly frustrated by the stupidity of vandals, & frankly confused by their motivation, I am deeply satisfied when one of them gets shut out. Thank you. (OK, I'm not showing the nicest side; I don't think vandals are entitled to the same treatment {as you could guess by my userpage}, & I'm a natural born [[Oscar the Grouch|grouch]] anyhow. =) ) [[User:Trekphiler|Trekphiler]] ([[User talk:Trekphiler|talk]]) 19:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
:Replying on their talk. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
::No sweat the delay. Just wanted to say it. (Actually, I didn't care if you replied or not. :)) [[User:Trekphiler|Trekphiler]] ([[User talk:Trekphiler|talk]]) 18:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

== RfA thanks! ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[Image:Solo Dios Sabe.jpg|160px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''RfA: Many thanks'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Many thanks for your participation in my recent [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jbmurray|request for adminship]]. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 16:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
|}

== Ddduh....removing beans from my nose ==

...just a note to tell you that I fell for that line. :)[[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 18:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
:replied on your talk --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 18:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

==Galápagos Islands task force==
Hi Barneca. In view of your significant contributions to the article [[Galápagos Islands]], I thought that you might be interested in visiting the new task force, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecuador/Galápagos Islands task force|Galápagos Islands task force]]. Thanks. [[User:GregManninLB|GregManninLB]] ([[User talk:GregManninLB|talk]]) 21:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

== my RfA - Ta! ==

[[Image:JWW_TheLadyOfShallot_1888.jpg|thumb|left|350px|Gwen gleans, wending keen by the wikirindle.<br><br>Thanks for supporting my RfA, which went through 93/12/5. I'll be steadfast in this trust the en.Wikipedia community has given me. Cheers! [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 01:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC) ]]
<br clear="all" />

==Hey!!==
Do you happen to be online at the moment? <font face="Ravie">[[User:Dustihowe|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dustihowe|<sup>complain/compliment</sup>]]</font> 16:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

:Thread continued on Dusti's talk page: [[User talk:Dustihowe#yes]]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 16:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

== <nowiki>{{-curled brackets-}}</nowiki> in header ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=216987808&oldid=216986619 Noted]; thanks for fixing that up. The links work for me fine in this browser, but the automatic edit summaries have stalled when {{tl|user}} and similar templates are used in-header in the past, so I understand where you're coming from. Thanks again. ;) [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 08:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:No problem, glad you understood what I was trying to say! I try to make that change whenever I notice it, but I never know how to clearly word the explanation for what I'm doing. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 11:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
==[[Barbaro family]]==
I wanted to give you a heads up on the possible return of sock puppet/puppeteer [[User:Mctrain]], it looks like [[User:Chiboyers]] is readding material to the Barbaro family page that was added by this group of puppets. I am tempted to revert and block, but I wanted to get your input first. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 02:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:Hi Daniel,

:I had blissfully forgotten about him during my break. Yes, that is definitely him, and you can feel quite comfortable in blocking and reverting as a blatantly obvious sock, with no worry of a risk of mistaken identity. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 02:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
::done, it retrospect it was a pretty easy choice, but since I am new at this I needed a little reassurance, thanks. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 02:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Glad to help, better safe than sorry. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 02:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
::::The user is contesting the block. A little more evidence would be nice at this point. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 07:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:::::Scratch that, it was more obvious than I thought. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 07:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

== Heh ==

Wow, imagine if RfAs ''were'' like the demonstration discussion you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=217193348 wrote here], especially the last three lines of it! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:It was still quite funny though. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 03:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
::I try. :) --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 03:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

== ANI, June 2008 ==

Thank you for jumping on top of that issue as soon as you did, I really appreciate it. I was reading through the note you left on his page, I was thinking, we should consider the last warning that he recieved his last, so there is always a deterrent if he feels he wishes to contend. Best regards, [[User:Chafford|Chafford]] ([[User talk:Chafford|talk]]) 18:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

== Back? ==

Are you back? Per your request when you went on wikibreak, I added your talk page to my watchlist. :-) --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 02:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
:Yeah, I'm back. I'm trying to reduce my time here even though I'm back, but as usual that isn't working out great. At the very least I'll be back enough to check my own talk page. Thanks for keeping an eye out. BTW, I guess you noticed (a thread or two up the page) our friend is back. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 02:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

== image speedy ==

thanks [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Asbr.jpg for this]. I was about to do an IAR delete because I couldn't find the right speedy) when you beat me to it <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 04:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
:Sure thing. I wasn't sure what the right speedy criterion was either, but figured no one whose opinion mattered to me would complain. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 10:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

==while you're here==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&diff=217529467&oldid=217525530 Could you deal with this?]. :) [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 14:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
:Done. doesn't seem to be a troll (unlike [[User:Jjonjonjon|some people]]), so only blocked for 31 hours. We'll see what happens after that. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
::I think that's ok. User's only (very) upset about a couple of A7 deletions. I didn't take it as a threat. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 14:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

==Incorrect Warning==
I have been editing the the "Bareback (sex)" article and i have been editing to return it to its original quality. After the vandalism it endured. I then receive a warning telling me i will be block if i do not stop. If you wish to post me a warning please read the changes before giving the warning as it is aimed at the wrong person in this case.

Thank
Matthew Barram
:I've replied on your talk page: [[User talk:123.243.186.175]]. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

== But can you unblock Eremia , I need only one account , I will use only this ! ==
Please , Barneca , can you unblock [[Eremia]] !

I need only one account !

I am waiting for a message !

I will not use abusively an onther account ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.203.173.69|86.203.173.69]] ([[User talk:86.203.173.69|talk]]) 10:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
You didn't answer me ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.128.69.167|92.128.69.167]] ([[User talk:92.128.69.167|talk]]) 10:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== IP Editor returning to his old ways. ==

Don't know if you remember this in too much detail, but a while back there was an IP editor who posted a few personal attacks and recieved a warning. Part of the conversation can be found here to help reference: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A142.106.63.213&diff=205018954&oldid=205017067 here]. This user posted under multiple IPs. One of those IPs is now back in the same articles and returning to personally attacking fellow editors [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_songs_in_Rock_Band&diff=prev&oldid=219123720 here]. I was going to post to [[WP:ANI]] but since this is a repeat offense and you dealt with it before I felt it may be helpful to drop a note to you first. Thanks! -- '''[[User:TRTX|TRTX]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:TRTX|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TRTX|C]]</small></sup>''' 21:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

== KiX ==

I would like you to help me write an article about KiX_PBX without violating G11.[[User:Filippos2|Filippos2]] ([[User talk:Filippos2|talk]]) 05:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

== [[User:Igorberger|Igorberger]] ==
Hello Barneca - I have mentioned you in dispatches [[User_talk:VirtualSteve#Igorberger|here]]. If you have the time could you please add your comments - especially in relation to that part that reflects my belief about whether or not you had given up on tutoring Igor? My thanks in advance.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 11:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


Hey barney, remember me?? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.67.55.170|84.67.55.170]] ([[User talk:84.67.55.170|talk]]) 20:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Invite to review a set of articles ==

Hi there. You participated in [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Copyright_violations_by_CarolSpears_on_Main_page|this ANI thread]]. I picked out the names of some editors I recognised, or who had extensive comments there, and I was wondering if you would have time to review the articles mentioned in the thread I've started [[User_talk:Carcharoth#Copyright_stuff|here]], and in particular the concerns I've raised there about how I used the sources. Thanks. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 09:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

==DyceBot==

No worries - that's fine by me. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Rebecca|Rebecca]] ([[User talk:Rebecca|talk]]) 01:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
:OK, thanks for letting me know my immediate desysoping wasn't in the cards. Ricky scared me with his wheel war talk... --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

== Good advice ==

When I first saw HoundDog23's comment on the Massino talk page, I did a random check of his contribs and came up with stuff like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiDon&diff=prev&oldid=221134121] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Diamond_Joe_Quimby&diff=prev&oldid=220834714], etc. On a second look, that sort of thing is not representative of HoundDog's contribs ''at all'', which definitely makes my comments a failure to assume good faith. I have taken your advice and removed the comments (as well as your reply to my comment on ANI, I assume that was okay?). Thanks for the sound advice! :) --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 14:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

:Heh, it's freakin' ''killing'' me to know what happened, though... heh.. I know it doesn't really matter, but it's driving me nuts. The name is ''obviously'' not a coincidence, so whoever it was had the patience and gall to create a mimic account in the wee hours of the morning on the off chance that they might have a chance to smear GM at some later time? Their timing was impeccable, too -- if they had just started running around making vandal edits when the account was first created, everyone would have seen right through it.
:I suppose GM could have used an open proxy or something, and it's still him, but I would have thought the CU would have identified any possibility of that.
:I dunno, I know I shouldn't speculate, but this is really driving me nuts! ha ha ha... --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 14:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

::I know exactly what you mean; it's really bugging me too. I have several competing theories (each assuming bad faith for a different editor!), so I eventually decided "sleuthing" isn't the answer, waiting as patiently as I can for Alison/Thatcher is. There seem, to me, to be several editors acting out of character, another recently indef blocked sockmaster involved somehow, and it's all just a bit over my head. If Massino was waiting to be unblocked immediately, I'd be even more anxious for the results ''now'', but since it will be a week at a minimum, I can almost, sort of, contain my curiousity. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

heh... Where on your user page does it say you are Irish? I can't even find it...? --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 19:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

:He's talking about Alison, who by the way '''exonerated him''' for Christ's sake. Although I'm 1/8th Irish, so I suppose I should have unblocked him immmediately since my irresistable hatred of all things Italian obviously makes me "involved" (actually, I only hate people who are 1/8 Italian). That looks like one of the least likely to succeed unblock requests I've seen: blank the talk page and complain that Alison is Irish, and therefore hates Italians? I really tried to bend over backwards and help him, and he wouldn't do it, so I give up. Did you see our discussion beforehand? Fascinating what other people consider "unfair" and what they consider reasonable behavior. I'm quite proud of myself; I wrote a pretty mean and snarky response to him, but thought twice and deleted it right before hitting save. Am I cool as a cucumber, or what? --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 19:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

::Yes, you have handled the situation quite admirably indeed! I did follow the whole discussion, as I found it fairly entertaining from start to finish :D And really, you performed impeccably. I really think that as Wikipedia evolves, we have forgotten that admins are now ''ambassadors'' as well as janitors/enforcers, and the kind of professionalism in the face of insanity that you displayed is sorely lacking sometimes in other admins. Good show!
::It is actually only the 2nd-least-likely-to-succeed block request I have seen. I didn't save the diff, but I actually saw one once that was a simple one-liner, "Please unblock me so I can continue harassing <some other user>". hehehe...
::The only thing that sucks about his "The admin is Irish!" unblock request is that it may make the Generale D'Amati Massino case a moot point... and then we'll never find out! :( --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 19:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

:::I wasn't fishing fo a compliment (although it certainly looks like it, doesn't it!), but thanks. And, notes on his talk page and ANI by Alison seem to indicate that our curiousity about that sock might be sated sometime soon. I'm embarassed to be this curious about something so trivial. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 19:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/General_Mannino&diff=221509756&oldid=221496086 And my jaw hits the ground...]

(P.S. I knew you weren't fishing for a compliment, but I thought you deserved it anyway. Too many "old school" admins, once they realize the other user is an asshole, they feel like it's okay to treat them like an asshole. It's a real problem. Anyway, I digress...)--[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 20:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

==Puppet of banned user==

I have noticed that you are active and so....

:[[User:72.75.24.245]] is puppet of banned user.
:You can see that IP [[user:72.75.5.121]] and [[user:72.75.18.173]] has been blocked in 2006 or 2007 because of sockpuppets of banned user. Because his new puppet [[user:J. A. Comment]] has been banned on my demand on 20 June he has started again to edit from IP. During last 3 years he has used IP range 72.75.xx.xxx and 71.252.xx.xx (example of blocked IP from this range:[[user:71.252.83.230]] and [[user:71.252.101.51]]) for editing Croatia related WWII articles.
:Can you please block IP 72.75.24.245 --[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] ([[User talk:Rjecina|talk]]) 23:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
::I'll look at it, but keep in mind I'm starting from ground zero, so it will take some time to review. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 23:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure he is a sock. · [[User:AO|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Black">'''A'''''ndonic'''''O'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:AO|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Navy">'''''Engage.'''''</font>]]</sup> 23:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks. I have not wanted to call you because of his personal attacks so I have looked for administrator which has never started actions against Velebit or his socks.--[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] ([[User talk:Rjecina|talk]]) 23:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
::As for a possible hidden agenda, I'm not quite sure. · [[User:AO|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Black">'''A'''''ndonic'''''O'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:AO|<font face="Times New Roman" color="Navy">'''''Engage.'''''</font>]]</sup> 23:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Rjecina: I have reviewed the situation, and am very comfortable that this is, indeed, J. A. Comment/Velebit. I only blocked the IP for a week, since it is likely dynamic; he's only been editing from it for a few days. Not sure what the longer term solution is, since he's jumping from IP to IP; perhaps come up with a concise, iron-clad explanation of the situation that you can either cut and paste, or refer to, when you talk to an uninvolved admin, so they don't have to re0invent the wheel each time.
:::Andonic: thanks for the input, didn't know you wanted to (or Rjecina wanted you to be able to) stay uninvolved. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
::::Only thing which I am having are his IP address ranges and editorial style (Croatia WW II, and similar). If you both are interested why I am patroling Croatia related articles for this user you can look 3 versions of 1 article. This is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ante_Paveli%C4%87&oldid=142371933 Velebit], this is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ante_Paveli%C4%87&oldid=192976163 AP1919] (Croatian neo-fascism version) and this is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ante_Pavelić today version] of article.
::::Because of this user attacks on Andonic:"AndonicO and Rjecina were teaming up against me " I have not wanted to call him, so that banned user can't recieve new ammunition for attacks--[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] ([[User talk:Rjecina|talk]]) 00:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

== Thank you for the help! ==

All of those IP's at once from all over the world tells me our cowardly little friend Grawp is at it again. What a pathetic loser. Thank you SO much for the help. I kind of wish I hadn't turned in the admin tools at this point. --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 00:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Choco chip cookie.jpg|100px|left]]

[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) has given you a [[cookie]]! Cookies promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! <br />

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
</div><!-- Template:Cookie -->

:you know, of course, that if you voluntarily gave them up, you could ask for them back anytime you want? --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

== semi-protect on [[User talk:PMDrive1061]] ==

Hi, looks like we both hit the button at the same time. My 24 hour protection overrode yours. Feel free to change back to what you set originally. Cheers [[User:Kevin|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin|talk]]) 00:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:The only reason I made it indef is so the vandals didn't have something to plan for; I (or anyone) could undo the protection quietly in a day or so. But it's just a personal tic; in other words, no reason to change it back. But... I was first, so I win! --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
::Damn this slow connection. I can never beat the Hugglers either. [[User:Kevin|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin|talk]]) 01:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Possibly the first time in my life that my achingly slow connection beat someone else's. I feel like I'm still on dial-up sometimes. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
*LOL! Yes, you did. The cookie is a rather inadequate expression of my gratitude. --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 01:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

==General Mannio==
Glad to see you're OK with my reducing the block per Alison, considering that I did so without contacting you first at all. My sincere apologies - Didn't mean to wheel war. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 01:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:No worries at all; I said in a couple of places (mostly now erased by General Mannino) that I was OK with an uninvolved admin changing the duration, I just slightly disagree is all (his brainless attack on Alison earlier today clinched it; see the conversation we had right before he blanked his talk page and requested an ublock). Plus, my judgement is suspect due to the indef block to begin with. Anyway, easy to reblock if it resumes. Cheers. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 01:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
::I agree; had it been anyone else but Alison who requested at the checkuser that the block be reduced, I would have left it be. That said, now that I see that there was a big ol' ANI thread on this, I wish I had checked in first. Hopefully, it's put to bed and over with, barring further shenanigans. Best to you, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 01:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you, actually. You both handled thing really well, IMO. Onwards to the next crisis :) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 07:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks for the kind words, Alison. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 11:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

== I am waiting for a message , can you unblock Monica Rosu , because I need only 1 acount ! ==

=== But can you unblock Eremia , I need only one account , I will use only this ! ===
Please , Barneca , can you unblock [[Eremia]] !

I need only one account !

I am waiting for a message !

I will not use abusively an onther account ! <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.203.173.69|86.203.173.69]] ([[User talk:86.203.173.69|talk]]) 10:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
You didn't answer me !

:No, I've given you several chances, but you continued to vandalize and use sock puppets each time. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Use the {{tl|unblock}} template on the talk page of whichever of your many, many accounts you want to use, and see if you can find an admin kinder and more trusting than me; you've already abused my trust enough, thank you. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 11:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


==JOINT STAFF J1==

You are correct that the portal can be deleted. Thank you. for that.[[User:Harry.l.gardner|Harry.l.gardner]] ([[User talk:Harry.l.gardner|talk]]) 22:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:Replied on your talk page. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

== FYI on 72.75.24.245 ==

Looks like he's already back on another account; pretty quickly after you blocked him, this other user, {{user3-small|Brzica milos etc}}, registered and reverted the prior edit to the article [[Ljubo Miloš‎]]. Claimed the refs that were cited were valid, etc. It's pretty clear this is just another shill account of the same IP/user. --/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 23:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
:I'm certainly not comfortable blocking an account after three edits, particularly when they don't appear disruptive. You may very well be right, but basically what he's done so far is (a) revert your removal of references that I'm in no position to judge; (b) discuss it on the talk page, and (c) tell you about it on your talk page. I blocked the IP last night because it was blatantly obvious that the person behind the IP was the same user who was behind J. A. Comment, and J. A. Comment was blocked as a sock of a banned user. Easy. But I have no special knowledge about what's going on in those articles; all I see, frankly, is you and Rejcina reverting anyone who disagrees with you as a "sockpuppet of JAComment". I'm just not going to take you word for it, especially after only three edits that don't look bad to me. I'm afraid you're either going to have to find an admin familiar with the Velebit/J.A.Comment case; write up in some detail an clear explanation of what the user is blocked for, and how you know this is him; or discuss the references on the talk page and see what happens. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
::Oh, okay. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to come off as pushy- I felt since you were the blocking administrator for {{user|72.75.24.245}} that you would be interested and involved enough to make that determination. Thanks for the advice! --/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 00:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
:::No, you're not being pushy at all; I just think there's a lot of history there that I don't know, that someone else likely does, and based on what I ''do'' know I'm not comfortable blocking after 3 reasonable-looking (from outside, at least) edits. If you know an admin who's more familiar with the situation, I suggest going to them. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 14:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

===Update for Mendeliv and Rjecina===
[[User:J. A. Comment]] has been unblocked by another admin. Since the only reason I blocked the IP was because they were an obvious sock of a blocked user, editing the same articles to avoid the block, it makes no sense for my block on the IP to remain. Mendaliv, and Rjecina, if you guys are sure J.A.Comment is the same person as Velebit, I'm afraid you're going to have to put together a new [[WP:SSP]] report (or maybe re-open the existing one, if that's possible), with more detail; it evidently wasn't enough. In the mean time, although I was comfortable blocking the IP because it was obviously J.A.Comment, I am distinctly '''un'''comfortable getting involved in the whole "sockpuppetry in Eastern Europe/Balkans" mess; it's an area I don't know anything about, and nearly impossible for someone like me to decipher. So, I'm afraid I won't be participating in any new WP:SSP; I just wouldn't be of any use. If you can think of anyhting specific you actually think I could add, then of course let me know. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 21:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks for information. I and User:Mangojuice are discussing situation. He is supporter of [[WP:AGF]] policy and I am supporter of [[WP:DUCK]] policy and this has become unblocking reason.--[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] ([[User talk:Rjecina|talk]]) 21:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
:Hm alright, thanks for the heads-up. I'm going to follow suit and keep out of this now that I'm becoming aware of the depth of this case. --/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 23:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
::You are invited to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Velebit2]]--[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] ([[User talk:Rjecina|talk]]) 19:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

== Personal attack on my page ==

Please, if you still think what you think - contact checkuser and ask for verification of you doubts.
My contributions are based on knowledge - not on doubts that someone is a bad guy. You are welcome on my talk pages only if wanting to discuss things related to the articles I've edited.--[[Special:Contributions/72.75.24.245|72.75.24.245]] ([[User talk:72.75.24.245|talk]]) 23:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
:Checkuser was already done, and inconclusive. It did not exonerate you, as you continually claim; it was inconclusive. But, you know this. As to Velebit; I have no idea. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey [[Adolf Hitler|Barneca]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Chiselandpaw|Chiselandpaw]] ([[User talk:Chiselandpaw|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chiselandpaw|contribs]]) 09:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Chief what's his name (commenting here so as not to rub it in on his talk page) ==

Cool! I sometimes think that waving the big stick can have a better effect than having to use it. I'll be around when the autoblock expires. --[[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 22:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
:Yup, a good admin can use the tools to get things done. A great admin can get things done without resorting to the tools (stolen from [[Wikipedia:Levels of competence]]). But then I always knew barneca would be a great admin. :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 23:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
::I hate to disagree when MastCell says nice things about me, but I didn't actually end up solving this; LHvU did, with a 3 hour block of one account that, coincidentally no doubt, stopped the other two accounts too. My threat didn't actually work. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 23:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

== [[Just In Case (Anye Elite song)]] ==

Hihi

Saw your rollback on the article...there seems to be something a little odd going on there...two editors are tag teaming it and only stuff relating to this person [[user:Chocolatecbj]] and [[user:Aleader]] Not sure if they are sockpuppets, meatpuppets, or just a couple of kids who found the same article at the same time, but I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at their contribs? THANKS! <font face="monospace">[[User:Legotech|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">LegoTech</span>]]&middot;([[User talk:Legotech|t]])&middot;([[Special:Contributions/Legotech|c]])</font> 23:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
:Hi Legotech,
:See the section above; I suspect that they are all 3 the same person, based on the fact that a 3 hour block on one of them has (evidently) silenced all of them. If more than one of them comment on the AFD, and the article is kept, I'd be tempted to ask for an RFCU (assuming that the duck test, my first choice, might seem too bitey). If that doesn't happen, I'm not sure it's worth the effort. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca#top|talk]]) 00:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
::I missed the third one...good catch. I'd left the three windows open while I went to grab Dad at the airport and missed the new guy. Why can't these people put this much effort into articles we NEED written?? :) <font face="monospace">[[User:Legotech|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">LegoTech</span>]]&middot;([[User talk:Legotech|t]])&middot;([[Special:Contributions/Legotech|c]])</font> 00:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

==Talk page==
Thanks for the reversions and protection. It's not the first time that particular person has felt the need to leve me a message. There was one on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACambridgeBayWeather&diff=220722883&oldid=220300103 21 June] and another on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACambridgeBayWeather&diff=221997165&oldid=221969196 27]. Thanks again. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 09:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

for your kind worms, User Binnacle! [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 12:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== Can you unblock Eremia , because I 'd like use i , only one account ! ==

I like to you to unblock Eremia , and I only use it , please , trust me !
Nathanaël Mini " [[Eremia]] " !
Ciao !

== I 'd like use Eremia , and only this ! ==
Can you unblock [[Eremia]] , I 'd like use this , I need onyle one account , please , help me , write m a message in my page of dscussion ! [[User:Alexandra Georgiana Eremia|Alexandra Gerogiana Eremia
]]

Revision as of 15:02, 9 July 2008

Why didn't you answer me when I speak with you ! I told you unblock Eremia 7 times , without using an another account abusively ! I have created

myself a lat account ( I hope this ! ) , by your fault ! I have waited ! And this is ENOUGH ! Must I blank you talk page for to have an answer ! Pleease , if you unblock Eremia , I will use only this account , I do not use a anoer account abusively ¡ You can give me a chaznce ! This is not a last try ! 

Alexandra Gerogiana Eremia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Barneca/Archive_7&oldid=224584233"