Talk:Tech trance: Difference between revisions
MTN~enwiki (talk | contribs) m moved Talk:Tech Trance to Talk:Tech trance |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Sorry, but who cutted out all the info I've been added to this page? Johan Gielen is anthem trance & uplifting trance, not tech-trance. Tech-trance is the style Marco V playing. Also every subgenre has seperated page, why this one wouldn't have? --[[User:81.182.120.12|81.182.120.12]] 12:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
Sorry, but who cutted out all the info I've been added to this page? Johan Gielen is anthem trance & uplifting trance, not tech-trance. Tech-trance is the style Marco V playing. Also every subgenre has seperated page, why this one wouldn't have? --[[User:81.182.120.12|81.182.120.12]] 12:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Tracks?== |
|||
I think the list of example tracks is really unecessary. I don't believe that any other genre article has something like that. Instead, very flushed out genre articles will reference tracks sporadicaly to show significant moments in the genre. At this point, I think the article is too small for something like that. [[User:Bognan72|Bognan72]] ([[User talk:Bognan72|talk]]) 22:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:05, 11 July 2008
![]() | Music/Music genres task force Stub‑class | ||||||
|
I removed this page from the genre list because it's not really called techtrance. I would argue that although it exists, it's not really a genre. Plus, as you admitted, it's a sub-genre and should go under trance.
Sorry, but who cutted out all the info I've been added to this page? Johan Gielen is anthem trance & uplifting trance, not tech-trance. Tech-trance is the style Marco V playing. Also every subgenre has seperated page, why this one wouldn't have? --81.182.120.12 12:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Tracks?
I think the list of example tracks is really unecessary. I don't believe that any other genre article has something like that. Instead, very flushed out genre articles will reference tracks sporadicaly to show significant moments in the genre. At this point, I think the article is too small for something like that. Bognan72 (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)