Jump to content

Talk:The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yahel Guhan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Yahel Guhan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Yahel, please don't add unreliable sources. If there's only one reliable source on the topic, that is cause for deletion. Also, I'm warning you agaisnt following me (obvious since you first edit to the article is simply a revert of mine).[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 21:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Yahel, please don't add unreliable sources. If there's only one reliable source on the topic, that is cause for deletion. Also, I'm warning you agaisnt following me (obvious since you first edit to the article is simply a revert of mine).[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 21:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
:So blind was your revert, that you even removed my question asking for the publsiher of the book (without answering my question).[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Legacy_of_Islamic_Antisemitism&diff=225170063&oldid=224891044][[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
:So blind was your revert, that you even removed my question asking for the publsiher of the book (without answering my question).[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Legacy_of_Islamic_Antisemitism&diff=225170063&oldid=224891044][[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
::When people are barely notable, we have to use what we can, meaning sources which normally would be considered less reliable become reliable. Playing the censorship game is unacceptable. You have been warned already at least 4 times about your paranoia (which you wrongfully state to be "stalking"). [[User:Yahel Guhan|<small><span style="color: #000000">YahelGuhan</span></small>]] ([[User talk:Yahel Guhan|<span style="color: #000000">talk</span>]]) 04:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
::When people are barely notable, we have to use what we can, meaning sources which normally would be considered less reliable become reliable. Playing the censorship game is unacceptable. You have been warned already at least 4 times about your paranoia (which you continue to wrongfully state as "stalking"). [[User:Yahel Guhan|<small><span style="color: #000000">YahelGuhan</span></small>]] ([[User talk:Yahel Guhan|<span style="color: #000000">talk</span>]]) 04:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:15, 15 July 2008

Yahel, please don't add unreliable sources. If there's only one reliable source on the topic, that is cause for deletion. Also, I'm warning you agaisnt following me (obvious since you first edit to the article is simply a revert of mine).Bless sins (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So blind was your revert, that you even removed my question asking for the publsiher of the book (without answering my question).[1]Bless sins (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When people are barely notable, we have to use what we can, meaning sources which normally would be considered less reliable become reliable. Playing the censorship game is unacceptable. You have been warned already at least 4 times about your paranoia (which you continue to wrongfully state as "stalking"). YahelGuhan (talk) 04:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]