Talk:Small Form-factor Pluggable: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:SFP transceiver to Talk:Small form-factor pluggable transceiver: WP:NAME: avoid abbreviations. |
→Port definition: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Are Fibre Channel and Ethernet SFP transcievers compatible with each other and/or the same device? Considering that they are the same form factor, it would be useful to have this information in this article [[User:Phayd|Jon Thompson]] 04:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
Are Fibre Channel and Ethernet SFP transcievers compatible with each other and/or the same device? Considering that they are the same form factor, it would be useful to have this information in this article [[User:Phayd|Jon Thompson]] 04:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Port definition == |
|||
Which is the TX and RX port? |
|||
What laser class is the TX? |
|||
Revision as of 01:34, 21 July 2008
Definitely does not need to be multiple SFP articles. Arguments could be made for and against any variation on the name (SFP optic, small form factor pluggable optic, etc), but "SFP transceiver" is a pretty good one.Mrand 02:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
for Your information.
Are Fibre Channel and Ethernet SFP transcievers compatible with each other and/or the same device? Considering that they are the same form factor, it would be useful to have this information in this article Jon Thompson 04:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Port definition
Which is the TX and RX port? What laser class is the TX?