Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RRaunak

RRaunak

• RRaunak (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ElementR (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: G

• Supporting evidence: There are many to be honest. They use pretty much the exact same signatures (RRaunak having: [+]►▌●√Ω ЯЯΛUNΛΣ● ▌ ElementR having: [+]►▪ Σ╙ΣMEΩ╦ Я ▪ (♪ ╥a|k ¿ ) ▪). They have the same signature fonts on their talkpages. They both edit their user pages a lot. They both seem to contact User:Cream often with headings such as "Hi" and "Hey". [1][2] and [3][4]. They also type the same way, some characters have no space between them, not capitalizing first letters in sentences, ect. Somewhat similar user pages and subpages.[5][6]. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

comment I changed signature today asking rraunak and tinucherian
[+]►▪ Σ╙ΣMEΩ╦ Я ▪ (♪ ╥a|k ¿ ) ▪ 07:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

 Clerk note: Can you please provide diffs showing the relationship and "team-tagging" (3RR avoidance, vote stacking, ...), if any? Being the same person is not a violation by itself. Thanks! -- lucasbfr ^talk 07:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ahem, there aren't any. They were just pretending to be different people but I really think their the same. Sorry, this is my first case request so I'm not very fluent in this area. -- RyRy (talk) 07:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with User:RyRy, there isnt a case for sockpuppetry in the typical sense( for team editing, editwars, 3RR workaround's etc). But this user has an annoying habbit of creating new userIDs all the time. Has been messing around with templates and has a tendency to ignore helpfull messages and warnings alike. Now he claims that ElementR is not his sock and that he is someone else named Rahul[7] despite the fact that a multitude of editors spotting the obvious. The only common behaviours(not diffs, sorry) that I can show is that both editors love deletions and scripting. A glance at their contribs should convice you.

RRaunak's contibutions and ElementR's contributions

To run a CU investigation, we need to see some evidence of disruption. Simply that these users are the same person is not enough -- that is permitted under policy. We need to see how these accounts would be going against policy in order to run the investigation. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 09:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

The evidence are in the following diffs. [8] (POints to my monobook.js as per User:Cream/newpages.js and another evidence hides in this link: [9] wich is a Recaptcha link to prevent spam. Once unlocked, the email is this: elemente@gmail.com wich matches the other username. Look at the contribs of both users: Special:Contributions/ElementR and Special:Contributions/RRaunak. Both of them are too new and they waited until they are autoconfirmed to start the use of the wikipedia tools. --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!^Talk 13:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)