User talk:Flatcurve: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[User:Flatcurve|Flatcurve]] ([[User talk:Flatcurve#top|talk]]) 21:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Flatcurve|Flatcurve]] ([[User talk:Flatcurve#top|talk]]) 21:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Last |
==Last empty threat== |
||
This is your last |
This is your last empty threat, continue the trolling and I will block you. [[User:KnightLago|KnightLago]] ([[User talk:KnightLago|talk]]) 21:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
How can I troll my own page? Seriously lame. [[User:Flatcurve|Flatcurve]] ([[User talk:Flatcurve#top|talk]]) 23:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC) |
How can I troll my own page? Seriously lame. [[User:Flatcurve|Flatcurve]] ([[User talk:Flatcurve#top|talk]]) 23:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:53, 26 July 2008
Welcome to the most popular, and factually correct page on Wikipedia
I have again redirected this article to Corn on the cob which was the existing article. There is no point having two articles about the same thing - that's what redirects are for. If you revert back, it will be tantamount to vandalism. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I did look at the edit history and it was your undoing of the redirection that I reverted. – ukexpat (talk) 19:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Ukexpat
please stop editing my talk page. kthx. Flatcurve (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I will continue to edit your talk page when necessary. If you stopped vandalising, making personal attacks etc, all these warnings would not be necessary. – ukexpat (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
well, by the power of greyskull, you have the power, homie. If this is what helps you cope with being a cuckold, by all means.Flatcurve (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KnightLago (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- You can remove it if you want, but heed its warning. KnightLago (talk) 21:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Taken from the Wikipedia page on vandalism:
Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention needs to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well intended, or outright vandalism.
So I ask you, oh wise one from Oxford, is a misguided decision to revert a redirect still considered tantamount to vandalism? It was an honest mistake and you saw fit to sling accusations of misdeeds. You'll never become an admin unless you learn how to take a lighter approach. Flatcurve (talk) 23:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
KnightLago
You too, buddy. You're complaining about something that isn't even there any more. Go outside, take a deep breath, enjoy some fresh air, and then relax. Flatcurve (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Last empty threat
This is your last empty threat, continue the trolling and I will block you. KnightLago (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
How can I troll my own page? Seriously lame. Flatcurve (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)