User talk:Gkleinman: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
← Blanked the page |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== January 2008 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Xcritic (talk)|, as you did to [[Talk:XCritic]]}}. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|Advertising]] and using Wikipedia as a "[[soapbox]]" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-advert1 --> [[User:Wisdom89|Wisdom89]] ([[User talk:Wisdom89|talk]]) 05:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as [[:{{{1}}}]],}} to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read [[Wikipedia:Your first article|Your first article]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-create2 --> [[User:Wisdom89|Wisdom89]] ([[User talk:Wisdom89|talk]]) 07:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== xcritic == |
|||
I took a look at the previous version of the page and also the Google cache. As you say, a very unfortunate piece of text. However as I understand it, recreating the page won't remove it from the Google cache, and the recreated version did not assert why xcritic is [[WP:N|notable]] enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. We quickly removed the incorrect text - this is about all that we are able to do right now. Google recrawls Wikipedia on fairly frequently, so hopefully they will remove the cached article soon. Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 18:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:The page is notable but COI exists. It's important that Google's page get recrawled and there needs to be some recourse for the editor who left those comments on deletion. [[User:Gkleinman|Gkleinman]] ([[User talk:Gkleinman#top|talk]]) 18:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't mind you creating the page as long as it meets our notability criteria, which the latest version does. The issue of the cached version being on Google is one you really need to pursue with Google, not Wikipedia, since Wikipedia has no control over what Google does. I also agree about the editor who left those comments in the first place and I will follow up on this. Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 18:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: I've also submitted the issue to the WP Pornography Project. The page may meet the notability criteria but I'm not comfortable with the COI issue. Please do follow up with the issue about the editor's comments. It's conduct unbecoming a WP Editor. [[User:Gkleinman|Gkleinman]] ([[User talk:Gkleinman#top|talk]]) 18:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::No question about the other editors' conduct. I have issued them an immediate, final warning about posting defamatory content. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 18:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Notable? This again? Exactly the same text which was deleted before? The same bogus claims about other web sites? Oh dear. I had hoped this nonsense had stopped. --[[User:Blowdart|Blowdart]] | [[User talk:Blowdart|''<sup>talk</sup>'']] 18:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Please see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography]] [[User:Gkleinman|Gkleinman]] ([[User talk:Gkleinman#top|talk]]) 18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==AfD nomination of Xcritic== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[Xcritic]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). |
|||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Xcritic (2nd nomination) | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xcritic (2nd nomination)]] | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xcritic]] }} and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). |
|||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Contacting google== |
|||
FYI the automated form to remove cached pages is [https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals?pli=1 here]. This was found simply by goggling google cache remove and clicking the first link. --[[User:Blowdart|Blowdart]] | [[User talk:Blowdart|''<sup>talk</sup>'']] 17:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Thanks. BTW there is a renewed case for notability for XCritic. [http://www.xbiz.com/news/90166 Another Citation in a Major Trade Mag] for the industry and now pending membership in the Xrated Critics Association. If that goes through would you be willing to take another assessment at notability? (provided of course I don't write the article? [[User:Gkleinman|Gkleinman]] ([[User talk:Gkleinman#top|talk]]) 16:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||