Talk:The Gateway (student magazine): Difference between revisions
Nick.wiebe (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* I don't support a merge; this has been discussed before (as a general issue, not specifically pertaining to ''[[The Gateway]]'') and I remain of the opinion that student newspapers are as legitimately notable as any other publication. Any other newspaper or magazine with a per-issue circulation of 11,000 would be allowed an article, so I don't see why student newspapers should be held to a different standard. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 17:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC) |
* I don't support a merge; this has been discussed before (as a general issue, not specifically pertaining to ''[[The Gateway]]'') and I remain of the opinion that student newspapers are as legitimately notable as any other publication. Any other newspaper or magazine with a per-issue circulation of 11,000 would be allowed an article, so I don't see why student newspapers should be held to a different standard. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 17:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Editors-in-chief == |
|||
I deleted the listing of the editor-in-chief history, but my edit was reverted. As such, I figure we should debate the matter here. I consider the section to be ugly, irrelevant, non-notable, disproportionately large, and only for vanity purposes. Gateway editors are typically not notable outside of campus, the editor-in-chief included. If anyone can provide a decent reason for leaving the information in, I'll oblige. Otherwise, If I get no response, I'll delete the section again.--[[Special:Contributions/96.52.132.224|96.52.132.224]] ([[User talk:96.52.132.224|talk]]) 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:49, 19 August 2008
Staff
So I added a staff listing (useful information) and it was deleted as a vanity link. I'm a bit unclear as to why that was. Comments? User:dkaszor
- A student newspaper's staff change annually, and with extremely rare exceptions aren't notable outside the university campus itself. Bearcat 17:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- By that logic, the list of board members should be removed as well, as it also changes anually. But I'm too lazy to actually do it myself. User:nick.wiebe
Proposed merger
The paper is a significantly large enough precence on campus to warrent a separate page, no need for a merge. User:dkaszor
- I don't support a merge; this has been discussed before (as a general issue, not specifically pertaining to The Gateway) and I remain of the opinion that student newspapers are as legitimately notable as any other publication. Any other newspaper or magazine with a per-issue circulation of 11,000 would be allowed an article, so I don't see why student newspapers should be held to a different standard. Bearcat 17:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Editors-in-chief
I deleted the listing of the editor-in-chief history, but my edit was reverted. As such, I figure we should debate the matter here. I consider the section to be ugly, irrelevant, non-notable, disproportionately large, and only for vanity purposes. Gateway editors are typically not notable outside of campus, the editor-in-chief included. If anyone can provide a decent reason for leaving the information in, I'll oblige. Otherwise, If I get no response, I'll delete the section again.--96.52.132.224 (talk) 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)