Jump to content

Talk:Áo dài/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kauffner (talk | contribs)
Kauffner (talk | contribs)
Diacriticals
Line 9: Line 9:


:There must be some mistake. Reference 2 is Claire Ellis, author of the book ''[http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Culture-Shock-Vietnam/Claire-Ellis/e/9781558686359 Culture Shock! Vietnam]''. Reference 4 is an academic article on Google Scholar. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner|talk]]) 03:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
:There must be some mistake. Reference 2 is Claire Ellis, author of the book ''[http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Culture-Shock-Vietnam/Claire-Ellis/e/9781558686359 Culture Shock! Vietnam]''. Reference 4 is an academic article on Google Scholar. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner|talk]]) 03:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

==Diacriticals==

"Aodai" is English-language word that appears in Merriam Webster, OED and other dictionaries -- always without diacriticals. So the diacriticals are inappropriate here. Picture galleries aren't the Wikipedia way. Some of the pictures don't even depict aodais. I'd like to see some of the pictures integrated with the text, but we don't want to put undue emphasis on the nineteenth century. [[User:Kauffner|Kauffner]] ([[User talk:Kauffner|talk]]) 09:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:47, 28 August 2008

GA Review

Hi. I'm going to review this article. Intothewoods29 (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, everything seems to check out, so I'm saying this is GA worthy. I liked how you defined so may terms. Some things I would do before any FA noms would be to check your refs; some of them might be called unreliable, like 2 and 4. There's a red link in the beginning, which should be fixed. It could also be expanded; I'd like a section about how the Communist government of Vietnam opposed the Aodai. I'd also check about Wikipe-tan on your article. ;) Intothewoods29 (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. flows well, organized
2.refs all seem good
3. keeps on topic
4. NPOV
5.Stable
6. pics all have tags.

There must be some mistake. Reference 2 is Claire Ellis, author of the book Culture Shock! Vietnam. Reference 4 is an academic article on Google Scholar. Kauffner (talk) 03:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diacriticals

"Aodai" is English-language word that appears in Merriam Webster, OED and other dictionaries -- always without diacriticals. So the diacriticals are inappropriate here. Picture galleries aren't the Wikipedia way. Some of the pictures don't even depict aodais. I'd like to see some of the pictures integrated with the text, but we don't want to put undue emphasis on the nineteenth century. Kauffner (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]