Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Connors (porn star): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*'''Keep''' per above. --[[User:THFFF|THFFF]] ([[User talk:THFFF|talk]]) 18:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per above. --[[User:THFFF|THFFF]] ([[User talk:THFFF|talk]]) 18:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
'''Caution''' - the nominator says in his personal page he is 16 year old. I am curious about the legality to engage a discussion about porn with a 16 year old in come countries. [[User:Hektor|Hektor]] ([[User talk:Hektor|talk]]) 05:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
'''Caution''' - the nominator says in his personal page he is 16 year old. I am curious about the legality to engage a discussion about porn with a 16 year old in come countries. [[User:Hektor|Hektor]] ([[User talk:Hektor|talk]]) 05:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Wikipedia is not censored for minors. |
:Wikipedia is not censored for minors. --[[User:THFFF|THFFF]] ([[User talk:THFFF|talk]]) 18:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:38, 29 August 2008
- Carol Connors (porn star) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Potentially non-notable porn actress, and the article lacks sources. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Add Deep Throat to the Gong Show to being Thora Birch's mom and I think you've got notability, even if not not porn star notability alone. But of course, it all needs sourcing. David in DC (talk) 20:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough reliable secondary sources to verify notability for own article. Most coverage is due to articles about her daughter. Notability is not conferred by association. Brief mention in Thora Birch and Deep Throat article (maybe gong show too) is adequate. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Just because a stub has no current references doesn't mean it should be deleted. Notability due to association with iconic events is obvious. The parenting is a secondary item worth mention but not the reason for notability. 2005 (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable within her genre and outside it as well. Independently notable beyond Thora Birch but still an association worth noting (and it's been widely noted in those esteemed "third party sources" too). 23skidoo (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet WP:PORNBIO. Lacks of reliable secondary sources. Tosqueira (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs some work, but I believe her to be notable due to the particular film she is in and the fact she has a mainstream movie actress daughter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbomock (talk • contribs) 20:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I just wanted to elaborate on my delete vote in that there's not much biographical information from reliable sources about Mrs. Connors beyond she's married to Jack, they were in Deep Throat, and they produced Thora but I guess I can live with that stub. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --THFFF (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Caution - the nominator says in his personal page he is 16 year old. I am curious about the legality to engage a discussion about porn with a 16 year old in come countries. Hektor (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not censored for minors. --THFFF (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)