User talk:CTF83!

Re: Image:US LGBT civil rights animation.gif

Thanks a lot for the heads-up on Louisiana. I actually already learned of it this morning, but thought I would hold off changing the maps until Friday when the executive order expires, but I revised the maps just now since it looks like it's sure to happen, and there's no reason to put it off. It's great that someone else is keeping a close tab on the maps. I'm going to start adding references for all the stages in the animated map, some of the legislative changes are hard to find on the web, especially the executive orders from the 70s-90s. Thanks again.
--Slyguy (talk) 00:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

---

3RR?

I don't really know the rules on this, but are we in any danger of violating WP:3RR on this Batman stuff? I've never been blocked before, and I don't want to have it happen over some silly shit like this. Unschool (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see he's finally been blocked. I feel better. Unschool (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

IRC

No real reason. I just never often remember, or get around to going on IRC. I'll try and remember to pop on tomorrow at some point. Gran² 21:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

User_Talk:GSK

Sorry about that - I assumed that removing the information was considered vandalism. Thank you for correcting that. --The One They Call GSK // talk to me // 15:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Userbox

Well for one, there are thousands of people using the non-homophobic userboxes, so I assumed that at least one person would use the homophobic one. Second, I thought you were supposed to represent as many points of view as possible in political userboxes. Correct me if i'm wrong. Tezkag72 (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Zibral

Because I get the impression that his first language isn't English and that he's not clear what he's doing wrong. I was about to warn him - once I've done that and if he continues, then please feel free to return (I speedied two of his articles anyway though). Black Kite 01:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes

Done :) --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

When You Dish Upon a Star

Sorry, meant to post this earlier, but what about the citations for the cultural references section? Qst (talk) 11:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:CR

No, because SNPP is considered a fansite and not a reliable third party source. Strangely enough, we are allowed to include links to it though in the EL section. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on Talk:Seth MacFarlane

Leave it alone --Gotl342 (talk) 20:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

DO NOT vandalize talk pages by removing comments. Ctjf83Talk 20:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I am not vandalizing anyhthing. I am a friend of his and he doesn't want it there. It still says prevous comments deleted, so what's the difference. --Gotl342 (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I already explained this to him several times, knock it off, or you will be blocked!! Ctjf83Talk 20:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Get an adminstraor to send me a message personally, saying that it has to say his username in the previously delted part. --Gotl342 (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

That's not my job, you go do it. You are vandalizing the page Ctjf83Talk 20:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

If it's not your job then leave it alone. Why do you care? --Gotl342 (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

By the way, randomface132 having sock puppets is against policy too. Ctjf83Talk 20:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

There is NOTHING on that page you sent that said you have to have your name inside the brackets. All it says is you have to have something written in the brackets. It is not vandalism, and there was no right to block Gotl342. Nothing was violated, and there is nothing wrong with deleting my name from the brackets, as long as it says previous comments deleted. --Randomface123 (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

You already didn't follow it, it says to strike comments, not delete them. Clearly an admin agreed with me, that's why your other sock puppet names are blocked Ctjf83Talk 21:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

That is all recommended, it did not say any of that stuff was mandatory. Why does this even concern you? --Randomface123 (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

What ever, delete your name at the top, but do not delete your name under kmccoy's section, as that clearly violates policy. Also, don't ask me to delete the convos off my talk page, because I won't! Ctjf83Talk 21:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, I don't appreciate you putting this whole conversation up, it is not necessary. But if you insist, then I guess there is nothing I can do. --Randomface123 (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

It is necessary, because the first time I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but now you are using sock puppets to remove comments. No more benefit of the doubt. Ctjf83Talk 21:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

That was not a sock puppet. I did not mean for people to mess with your talk page, I just simply asked for their help. I apologize if they did something you didn't like, but I would appreciate if you removed this conversation. --Randomface123 (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I already explained to you I will not remove this conversation, so don't ask again! You also asked for them to help you delete stuff you have already been warned about, and they claimed to be your friend. Ctjf83Talk 22:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I can assure you none of them will do any more. I do not want my comments on here. --Randomface123 (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Too bad! They are staying! Ctjf83Talk 22:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Why does it matter? I assure you I will never bother you again. Please be flexible. If there was any other way to talk, I would do it but unfortunatley these comments are posted so everyone can see them. The issue is over, and thank you for letting me delete my name on the talk page. I will not talk about it anymore if you delete my comments on here. --Randomface123 (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Can I put brackets then? Why do you insist this be here? --Randomface123 (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Declined Clearly I won't let you put it in brackets, or delete it. So deal with it, or you will be warned! Ctjf83Talk 22:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Why? --Randomface123 (talk) 22:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I told you I won't comment on it again, what more do you want? --Randomface123 (talk) 22:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

DO NOT post anything else on my talk page about this matter, or I will report you for vandalism, LAST WARNING!!! Ctjf83Talk 22:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Is it going to be archived or anything? Why can't you delete my comments I promise I will not comment again. --Randomface123 (talk) 22:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

You deleted his but not mine? Why are you doing this just to prove a point. If you would just delete them you could end this. --Randomface123 (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

or you could end it, by not harassing me, and dealing with the comments you made Ctjf83Talk 00:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, ok. I didn't mean for these comments to sound like harassment. I am just trying to ask you nicely, and I apologize. --Randomface123 (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)