User talk:86.153.130.184: Difference between revisions
reply |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Relax friend, you're really annoyed I guess. Yes, I'm an Indian, but I adhere to an NPOV whether in Indian or Pakistani articles. The article on PoK however is still valid as long as it is not nominated for deletion. Just because you think it's biased, you don't 'censor' access to it, but rather improve it to neutral standards. Either that or request its deletion once and for all! To repeat myself, till then, it is counted a valid page. I assume all further discussions will be on this page as I understand your ISP uses D.Ip. Or you can use your former username Nangparbat as I believe it's still active (i.e. not blocked). thanks. <span style="border: 2px solid #828282; padding: 0px;">[[User:S3000|<span style="background: #ffffff; color: #828282;"> S3000 </span>]][[User talk:S3000|<span style="background: #828282; color: #FFFFFF;"> ☎</span>]]</span> 12:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
:Relax friend, you're really annoyed I guess. Yes, I'm an Indian, but I adhere to an NPOV whether in Indian or Pakistani articles. The article on PoK however is still valid as long as it is not nominated for deletion. Just because you think it's biased, you don't 'censor' access to it, but rather improve it to neutral standards. Either that or request its deletion once and for all! To repeat myself, till then, it is counted a valid page. I assume all further discussions will be on this page as I understand your ISP uses D.Ip. Or you can use your former username Nangparbat as I believe it's still active (i.e. not blocked). thanks. <span style="border: 2px solid #828282; padding: 0px;">[[User:S3000|<span style="background: #ffffff; color: #828282;"> S3000 </span>]][[User talk:S3000|<span style="background: #828282; color: #FFFFFF;"> ☎</span>]]</span> 12:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
if you have read the article it only shows the indian veiw of "POK" who uses the term "POK" you guessed it the INDIANS name me one nation beside India which uses "POK" the page should clearly state that the term is used by indians exclusively. |
|||
Revision as of 12:12, 1 September 2008
NPOV
I'm trying to work out something with you. If you could temporarily stop your edits and check the edit summary of the J&K page. Rather than warring, lets set this straight once and for all. Thanks S3000 ☎ 10:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
im trying to tell you for the millionth time that stop redirecting to the recently produced NPOV infested article called "POK" just read it however you being indian yourself you wont find it NPOV but other editors including NON pakistani editors also find it pathetic there is huge controversy over this lame article and now you suddenly want to redirect to it well im telling you i wont allow this 86.153.130.184 (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Relax friend, you're really annoyed I guess. Yes, I'm an Indian, but I adhere to an NPOV whether in Indian or Pakistani articles. The article on PoK however is still valid as long as it is not nominated for deletion. Just because you think it's biased, you don't 'censor' access to it, but rather improve it to neutral standards. Either that or request its deletion once and for all! To repeat myself, till then, it is counted a valid page. I assume all further discussions will be on this page as I understand your ISP uses D.Ip. Or you can use your former username Nangparbat as I believe it's still active (i.e. not blocked). thanks. S3000 ☎ 12:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
if you have read the article it only shows the indian veiw of "POK" who uses the term "POK" you guessed it the INDIANS name me one nation beside India which uses "POK" the page should clearly state that the term is used by indians exclusively.