Cockney School: Difference between revisions
m Replacing Image:LeighHunt5.jpg with Image:Leigh_Hunt.jpg (by Rlevse because: Was in category "Duplicate", exact duplicate). |
tweak |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''"Cockney School"''' was an alleged group of [[cockney]] poets writing in [[England]] in the second and third decade of the nineteenth century. The term came in the form of hostile [[literary criticism|reviews]] in ''[[Blackwood's Magazine]]'' in 1817. Its primary target was [[Leigh Hunt]] |
The '''"Cockney School"''' was an alleged group of [[cockney]] poets writing in [[England]] in the second and third decade of the nineteenth century. The term came in the form of hostile [[literary criticism|reviews]] in ''[[Blackwood's Magazine]]'' in 1817. Its primary target was [[Leigh Hunt]] but included [[John Keats]] and [[William Hazlitt]]. |
||
[[Image:Leigh_Hunt.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Leigh Hunt]] the supposed chief offender of the "Cockney School."]] |
[[Image:Leigh_Hunt.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Leigh Hunt]] the supposed chief offender of the "Cockney School."]] |
||
Revision as of 04:02, 4 September 2008
The "Cockney School" was an alleged group of cockney poets writing in England in the second and third decade of the nineteenth century. The term came in the form of hostile reviews in Blackwood's Magazine in 1817. Its primary target was Leigh Hunt but included John Keats and William Hazlitt.
Each of the writers was derided for a slightly different quality. Keats, for example, was accused of "low diction" for rhyming "thorns/fawns" in "Sleep and Poetry" and other rhymes which suggested a working class speech. Hunt and Hazlitt were similarly vilified for their diction, but the criticisms were more ideological with them than with Keats. John Wilson Croker perpetuated the term "Cockney School" beyond the pages of Blackwood's in 1818 when he attacked Keats's Endymion in the Quarterly Review.
The term, and the campaign against Hunt and the others, was not a question of aesthetics. It was, instead, an attack on the class background of the authors and their aspirations to the highest level of the literati, and it was, additionally, a reaction to the "Cockney" politics of the authors. The political, reformist agenda and the democratic ideology of Hunt and Hazlitt were offensive to the Blackwoods review staff, and the cultural and class background of the authors was introduced as a mechanism. Percy Bysshe Shelley was accused of being similarly offensive politically, but the reviewers excused him for his genius (and, of course, his high birth).
The second generation of the Romantic movement was as politically and economically revolutionary as it was aesthetically challenging to the status quo, and the controversy and partial reviewers responsible for the creation of the "Cockney School" epithet foreground how offensive it was to the establishment that lower class persons might emerge. According to the 1907 Nuttall's Brief Encyclopedia, the term was revived in the 1890s by working class London poets, but, although this may have been en vogue at the turn of the twentieth century, the term is currently remembered for the Romantic reference only.
References
- Richardson, Alan. "Cockney School" in Preminger, Alex and T. V. F. Brogan, eds. The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1993. 221-222.