Jump to content

User talk:MrSchimpf: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rmv prod notice and deleted image discussion (PROD was changed back to RD)
Kaitlin510 (talk | contribs)
Line 48: Line 48:
==Airport notability discussion==
==Airport notability discussion==
You have shown interest in an airport AfD in the past at [[Chadwick Airport] You may wish to visit [[Stoney Point Airfield]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield]] to participate as well. This message is being sent to editors who participated at Chadwick but have not participated at Stoney Point, regardless of the editor's opinion. Thank you!--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 11:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
You have shown interest in an airport AfD in the past at [[Chadwick Airport] You may wish to visit [[Stoney Point Airfield]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield]] to participate as well. This message is being sent to editors who participated at Chadwick but have not participated at Stoney Point, regardless of the editor's opinion. Thank you!--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 11:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software ==

[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software]]<br />
Hi, I started this article and would like to discuss your reasons for deletion. I understand that I am the primary editor with few exceptions, but can that be an argument since I can't exactly seek out other users to edit it? I am an advocate for NPOV as well; please let me know if I can improve the article. Thanks for your dedication to improving Wikipedia!
[[User:Kaitlin510|Kaitlin510]] ([[User talk:Kaitlin510|talk]]) 16:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:25, 5 September 2008

  • I will try to fix any image problems as soon as possible if a bot leaves me a question about an image and then revert the bot's edit to acknowlege it as resolved. I like to keep things neat and focused on discussions, not line after line of image problems to take care of.
  • I do carry rollback privileges, so if you need any help and I'm on, you can ask me here. However, not I will not get into edit wars and only use rollback for basic vandalism repair.
  • I also work on the conversation style of 'respond on your talk page, you respond here, I'll respond there', etc.

Teech/Phill Lewis

Thank you for your good edits. I had found the sources cited in these articles and thought I'd handled the BLP concerns appropriately. You handled them better. Cheers. David in DC (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

I have granted rollback to your account. Please be sure to read WP:ROLLBACK thoroughly and be sure to use to tool to revert no more than simple vandalism, or the function will be removed accordingly. Happy editing to you. Keegantalk 06:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agim Dalipi

Hello There!!!!

You reverted my edit to the vandal edition. May I know the reason..Why?

Its Ok...

Hitrohit2001 (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001[reply]

I'm taking a break...

Because you have been one of the editors with whom I have a good working relationship, I've decided to write this to you directly.

I'm taking a break from editing for a while. There's too much going on with me in this place that I need to regroup, enjoy the summer, and refocus. I feel that there is a lack of cohesiveness and willingness to share opinions and work together the way we should here, at least in certain areas. Right now, all of this is coming to a head for me, and I've decided to take a step back. I'm not sure when I'll return, but I will. Keep up the good work, and hold the fort until I return. ( :) ) Rollosmokes (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrschimpf,

What was the problem with this article? It doesn't appear to have been vandalism, per [1], [2], etc. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take another look at

Macaroni soup. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"...a regular Dethklok..." Hahaha! Cliff smith talk 17:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You voted in this AFD that I started. It is only fair to mention that there has been a substantial change to the article since I nominated it for deletion, in that it now has a release date and a title. You may or may not wish to rethink your vote.
Kww (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Airport notability discussion

You have shown interest in an airport AfD in the past at [[Chadwick Airport] You may wish to visit Stoney Point Airfield and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield to participate as well. This message is being sent to editors who participated at Chadwick but have not participated at Stoney Point, regardless of the editor's opinion. Thank you!--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyland Software
Hi, I started this article and would like to discuss your reasons for deletion. I understand that I am the primary editor with few exceptions, but can that be an argument since I can't exactly seek out other users to edit it? I am an advocate for NPOV as well; please let me know if I can improve the article. Thanks for your dedication to improving Wikipedia! Kaitlin510 (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]