Jump to content

Saint Marinus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm expand from stub
Line 42: Line 42:
[[Category:History of San Marino]]
[[Category:History of San Marino]]
[[Category:Sammarinese Christians]]
[[Category:Sammarinese Christians]]
[[Category:San Marino (city)]]


{{saint-stub}}
{{saint-stub}}

Revision as of 21:08, 8 September 2008

Saint Marinus
Died366 (traditional)
Venerated inRoman Catholic Church
Major shrineBasilica of Saint Marinus
FeastSeptember 3
Attributesdepicted as a bearded layman with a stonemason's hammer; also depicted as a young deacon with a hammer; depicted serving as a deacon to Saint Leo the Great or Saint Gaudentius; two oxen near him.
PatronageSan Marino

Saint Marinus was the founder of one of the world's oldest surviving republics, San Marino, in 301. Tradition holds that he was a stonemason by trade who came from the island of Rab on the other side of the Adriatic Sea (modern Croatia), fleeing persecution for his Christian beliefs in the Diocletianic Persecution. He became a Deacon, and was ordained by St. Gaudentius, Bishop of Rimini, until he was accused by an insane woman of being her estranged husband, when he fled to Monte Titano to live as a hermit. His memorial day is September 3, commemorating the day of the year when he founded San Marino, which is also San Marino's national holiday. According to legend, he died in the Winter of 366 and his last words were: "Relinquo vos liberos ab utroque homine." ("I leave you free from both men"). [1]

Notes

  1. ^ This somewhat mysterious phrase is most likely to refer, to the two "men" from whose oppressive power Saint Marinus had decided to separate himself, becoming a hermit on Mount Titano: respectively the Emperor and the Pope. This affirmation of freedom (first and foremost fiscal franchise) from both the State and the Church, however legendary, has always been the inspiration of the tiny republic. (source: "The Republic of San Marino", William Miller, The American Historical Review, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Jul., 1901), pp. 633-649)