Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire fetish: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Sexuality and gender |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Attempts at finding reliable sources have failed, and reliable sources are unlikely to exist given the neologistic, marginal, idiosyncratic and sexual nature of the subject. By the same token; the subject's notability is absent, and therefore the article is unable to avoid the function of "advocacy". [[User:Redblueball|Redblueball]] ([[User talk:Redblueball|talk]]) 16:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
Attempts at finding reliable sources have failed, and reliable sources are unlikely to exist given the neologistic, marginal, idiosyncratic and sexual nature of the subject. By the same token; the subject's notability is absent, and therefore the article is unable to avoid the function of "advocacy". [[User:Redblueball|Redblueball]] ([[User talk:Redblueball|talk]]) 16:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 19:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
'''weak keep''' Vampires as a subconscious sexual metaphor is something that has been explored in both pop writing and more serious works, but I'm not sure if that warrants this as a separate article from 'vampire'. [[Special:Contributions/129.89.68.62|129.89.68.62]] ([[User talk:129.89.68.62|talk]]) 21:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:07, 10 September 2008
- Vampire fetish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Attempts at finding reliable sources have failed, and reliable sources are unlikely to exist given the neologistic, marginal, idiosyncratic and sexual nature of the subject. By the same token; the subject's notability is absent, and therefore the article is unable to avoid the function of "advocacy". Redblueball (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
weak keep Vampires as a subconscious sexual metaphor is something that has been explored in both pop writing and more serious works, but I'm not sure if that warrants this as a separate article from 'vampire'. 129.89.68.62 (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)