User talk:Threeafterthree: Difference between revisions
noted 3rr warning from Wikidemon and reverted self on article page |
→Please take a look at the Weatherman/Terrorism RfC: new section |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:Hi Norton, thanks for the heads up and no, I don't mind if you move my comments. As always, Wikipedia is not about the "truth" but about already established, reliably sourced material. Are there sources that describe Ayers as violent? If so, it would be good to add that citation to the lead paragraph of that article so the revert war can slow. Thank you, --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] 15:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
:Hi Norton, thanks for the heads up and no, I don't mind if you move my comments. As always, Wikipedia is not about the "truth" but about already established, reliably sourced material. Are there sources that describe Ayers as violent? If so, it would be good to add that citation to the lead paragraph of that article so the revert war can slow. Thank you, --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] 15:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Responded [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANoroton&diff=239804977&oldid=239799701 on my talk page] -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 16:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
::Responded [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANoroton&diff=239804977&oldid=239799701 on my talk page] -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 16:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Please take a look at the Weatherman/Terrorism RfC == |
|||
Hi! This is a form notice sent to several editors who have contributed recently at the [[Bill Ayers]] page or talk page (sent in accordance with [[WP:CANVASS]]). A proposal has been made near the bottom of [[Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC]] concerning the [[Bill Ayers]] article in connection with use of the word "terrorism" and discussion of it in the article. Other proposals have been made concerning similar articles, and a large amount of information about sources on this topic are available on the page. Please take a look and consider supporting or opposing some of the proposals. Also, if you think "violent" is a better description for Ayers or Weatherman, please take another look at [[Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and violence]]. Thanks. -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 02:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:48, 22 September 2008
Welcome.......
Do YOU know what the word outwith means???
 Tom's Archives |
|---|
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. I will respond to you in here AND copy and paste the thread onto your talk page as well. Thank you. - Tom
Re: Bill Ayers
Thank you for participating in editing the Bill Ayers article and discussing calmly on the talk page. I'm trying to come to a consensus on various aspects of the lead. In order to keep comments about "violence" in one spot, I consolidated a short section and moved your comment and Scjessey's into Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and violence. I'm going to try to ignore all impolite comments on that page and reach a consensus. If you have a problem with my moving your comment, please feel free to move it back. I appreciate the views of any editors, whether or not they agree with mine, as long as they can state them civilly, so thank you. I've also got a proposal at Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC#Noroton's proposal #1 -- for Bernardine Dohrn which I expect will get more comment. I'll be making a similar proposal about Bill Ayers on that page by tomorrow, and whether you agree or disagree, any civil comments there are welcome, too. -- Noroton (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Norton, thanks for the heads up and no, I don't mind if you move my comments. As always, Wikipedia is not about the "truth" but about already established, reliably sourced material. Are there sources that describe Ayers as violent? If so, it would be good to add that citation to the lead paragraph of that article so the revert war can slow. Thank you, --Tom 15:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Responded on my talk page -- Noroton (talk) 16:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at the Weatherman/Terrorism RfC
Hi! This is a form notice sent to several editors who have contributed recently at the Bill Ayers page or talk page (sent in accordance with WP:CANVASS). A proposal has been made near the bottom of Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC concerning the Bill Ayers article in connection with use of the word "terrorism" and discussion of it in the article. Other proposals have been made concerning similar articles, and a large amount of information about sources on this topic are available on the page. Please take a look and consider supporting or opposing some of the proposals. Also, if you think "violent" is a better description for Ayers or Weatherman, please take another look at Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and violence. Thanks. -- Noroton (talk) 02:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)