User talk:Xinunus: Difference between revisions
→Please take a look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC: new section |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Editorials are usually not neutral and thus should not be cited. And you must be well aware of it. [[User:Julius Sahara|Julius Sahara]] ([[User talk:Julius Sahara|talk]]) 19:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
:Editorials are usually not neutral and thus should not be cited. And you must be well aware of it. [[User:Julius Sahara|Julius Sahara]] ([[User talk:Julius Sahara|talk]]) 19:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
::My sources are not editorials. When a journalist writes an editorial they state this in their article. My sources clearly are not doing this. They are reporting on his trip and the facts behind the trip. Please refer to the wiki site about [[editorials]]. Its clearing states this. Per wiki rules you can not just delete information without looking like your vandelising a wiki page. You clearly started deleting information first then started asking questions later. This is not the proper way to go about editing pages on wiki. All my sources are from valid news organizations and are not editorials. Please stop deleting my information. --[[User:Xinunus|Xinunus]] ([[User talk:Xinunus#top|talk]]) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
::My sources are not editorials. When a journalist writes an editorial they state this in their article. My sources clearly are not doing this. They are reporting on his trip and the facts behind the trip. Please refer to the wiki site about [[editorials]]. Its clearing states this. Per wiki rules you can not just delete information without looking like your vandelising a wiki page. You clearly started deleting information first then started asking questions later. This is not the proper way to go about editing pages on wiki. All my sources are from valid news organizations and are not editorials. Please stop deleting my information. --[[User:Xinunus|Xinunus]] ([[User talk:Xinunus#top|talk]]) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Please take a look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC == |
|||
This is a message sent to a number of editors who recently edited [[Weatherman (organization)]] or its related talk page, and following [[WP:CANVASS]] requirements: Please take another look at [[Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC]] and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. Thanks! -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 04:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:41, 22 September 2008
Dear Xinunus, please use the 'Show preview'-functionality until you are satisfied with your edits. See Help:Show preview: "Saving the same article a large number of times in quick succession makes it harder for people to check what changed, and clogs up the page history". Thank you and best regards, --R.Schuster (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
I tried that and was having a problem getting it to just display a thumb preview of the picture. I had to use a gallery to finally get it to work. --Xinunus (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Editorials are usually not neutral and thus should not be cited. And you must be well aware of it. Julius Sahara (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- My sources are not editorials. When a journalist writes an editorial they state this in their article. My sources clearly are not doing this. They are reporting on his trip and the facts behind the trip. Please refer to the wiki site about editorials. Its clearing states this. Per wiki rules you can not just delete information without looking like your vandelising a wiki page. You clearly started deleting information first then started asking questions later. This is not the proper way to go about editing pages on wiki. All my sources are from valid news organizations and are not editorials. Please stop deleting my information. --Xinunus (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC
This is a message sent to a number of editors who recently edited Weatherman (organization) or its related talk page, and following WP:CANVASS requirements: Please take another look at Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. Thanks! -- Noroton (talk) 04:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)