Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori And The Chameleons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:48, 23 September 2008

Was requested speedy, but let's settle this the right way, shall we? Bilodeauzx (talk) 04:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Zoo Records. While technically passing WP:MUSIC#C6, I can't find any good ref's to prove stand alone notability. As a side note, Lori and the Chameleons and Lori & The Chameleons already redirect to Zoo Records. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 06:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Was not anything more than a footnote in Big In Japan's history. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme.
Weak Keep - they were popular at the time in the scene. A few singles that sold well and a few worthy members. If the article can't be expanded with cites, I think it should be deleted town the road. daleki (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:31, 22 September 2008 edit Francodamned (talk \| contribs) 6,350 edits →Lori And The Chameleons ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:48, 23 September 2008 edit undo Methelfilms (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 524 edits →Lori And The Chameleons Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	* They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme.		* They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme.
			* '''Weak Keep''' - they were popular at the time in the scene. A few singles that sold well and a few worthy members. If the article can't be expanded with cites, I think it should be deleted town the road. [[User:Methelfilms\|daleki]] ([[User talk:Methelfilms\|talk]]) 08:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)