Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori And The Chameleons: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Methelfilms (talk | contribs) |
Methelfilms (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme. |
* They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme. |
||
* '''Weak Keep''' - they were popular at the time in the scene. A few singles that sold well and a few worthy members. If the article can't be expanded with cites, I think it should be deleted |
* '''Weak Keep''' - they were popular at the time in the scene. A few singles that sold well and a few worthy members. If the article can't be expanded with cites, I think it should be deleted down the road. [[User:Methelfilms|daleki]] ([[User talk:Methelfilms|talk]]) 08:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 08:48, 23 September 2008
- Lori And The Chameleons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was requested speedy, but let's settle this the right way, shall we? Bilodeauzx (talk) 04:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Zoo Records. While technically passing WP:MUSIC#C6, I can't find any good ref's to prove stand alone notability. As a side note, Lori and the Chameleons and Lori & The Chameleons already redirect to Zoo Records. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 06:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. Was not anything more than a footnote in Big In Japan's history. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC).
- They released some singles, few but the band wasn't very anonyme.
- Weak Keep - they were popular at the time in the scene. A few singles that sold well and a few worthy members. If the article can't be expanded with cites, I think it should be deleted down the road. daleki (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)