Jump to content

Talk:Wet wipe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
support in keeping and expanding article
Line 2: Line 2:
* Maybe rewrite the article - ''i.e.'' How are they made? Do they come in different scents? As it's written right now, I think it's okay to delete, but if it rewritten and becomes an ''encyclopedic'' entry, then it might be worth keeping. --[[User:Barista|Barista]] | a/k/a マイケル | [[User_talk:Barista|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Barista|C]] 20:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
* Maybe rewrite the article - ''i.e.'' How are they made? Do they come in different scents? As it's written right now, I think it's okay to delete, but if it rewritten and becomes an ''encyclopedic'' entry, then it might be worth keeping. --[[User:Barista|Barista]] | a/k/a マイケル | [[User_talk:Barista|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Barista|C]] 20:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
** It is worth keeping. However, it is lacking a lot of information. I looked it up to know what kind of cloths, chemicals, and processes are used to make them. This article doesn't help with that yet, but in time it should get there. Give it time, and do what you can to help. [[User:SadanYagci|SadanYagci]] 05:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
** It is worth keeping. However, it is lacking a lot of information. I looked it up to know what kind of cloths, chemicals, and processes are used to make them. This article doesn't help with that yet, but in time it should get there. Give it time, and do what you can to help. [[User:SadanYagci|SadanYagci]] 05:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
**when and if someone should tackle expanding this article, be sure to include (a) how invented; (b) who invented, (c) who holds patent? and (d) language about the most-important (in my household anyway) "flushable" kind.--[[Special:Contributions/68.173.2.68|68.173.2.68]] ([[User talk:68.173.2.68|talk]]) 03:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:10, 25 September 2008

This page should no longer be a candidate for speedy deletion since moist towelettes are a significant human artifact used across the globe. If you have problems with the contents or wording of this article, make modifications, but don't delete the article.

  • Maybe rewrite the article - i.e. How are they made? Do they come in different scents? As it's written right now, I think it's okay to delete, but if it rewritten and becomes an encyclopedic entry, then it might be worth keeping. --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 20:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is worth keeping. However, it is lacking a lot of information. I looked it up to know what kind of cloths, chemicals, and processes are used to make them. This article doesn't help with that yet, but in time it should get there. Give it time, and do what you can to help. SadanYagci 05:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • when and if someone should tackle expanding this article, be sure to include (a) how invented; (b) who invented, (c) who holds patent? and (d) language about the most-important (in my household anyway) "flushable" kind.--68.173.2.68 (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]